• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。

Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.

机构信息

Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, C/ Avicena S/N, 41009 Sevilla, (Spain),

出版信息

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.

DOI:10.4317/medoral.22761
PMID:31422408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6764718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assess the reliability (by means of reproducibility and repeatability) of the PenguinRFA system, analyse the ISQ values of different implant types and correlate the ISQ with the insertion torque during the placement of the implant.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

120 rough surface implants were placed in bovine bone (type II and III). The implants were divided into groups, according to its design. Once the implants were in place, the exact insertion torque was registered. Then, primary stability was measured by means of the resonance frequency analysis with the PenguinRFA and the Osstell ISQ devices. In each implant two transducers of each device were used. Three measurements were obtained with each transducer.

RESULTS

The mean ISQ (implant stability quotient) of the whole sample is 67,70 ± 5,51. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is 0,933 and 0,944 for transducers 1 and 2 respectively. The reproducibility is 0,906. The mean insertion torque is 24,54 ± 8,96N. The correlation between the ISQ and the insertion torque is 0,507 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,468 p<0,000 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type II and 0,533 p<0,801 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,193 p<0,140 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type III.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present trial suggest that the PenguinRFA presents excellent reproducibility and repeatability, so it could be very useful in the monitoring of the stability of implants over time. Additionally, according to the results, the correlation between the IT and the RFA is low and there are no statistically significant differences in between implant types.

摘要

背景

评估 PenguinRFA 系统的可靠性(通过可重复性和再现性),分析不同种植体类型的 ISQ 值,并将 ISQ 值与种植体植入时的植入扭矩相关联。

材料和方法

将 120 个粗糙表面种植体植入牛骨(II 型和 III 型)。根据其设计将种植体分为不同的组。一旦种植体就位,就会记录准确的植入扭矩。然后,使用 PenguinRFA 和 Osstell ISQ 设备通过共振频率分析测量初始稳定性。在每个种植体上,每个设备使用两个传感器。每个传感器获得三次测量值。

结果

整个样本的平均 ISQ(种植体稳定性指数)为 67.70 ± 5.51。内类相关系数(ICC)分别为 0.933 和 0.944 对于传感器 1 和 2。重复性为 0.906。平均植入扭矩为 24.54 ± 8.96N。ISQ 与植入扭矩之间的相关性为 0.507 p<0.000(MultiPeg 1)和 0.468 p<0.000(MultiPeg 2)对于 II 型骨,以及 0.533 p<0.801(MultiPeg 1)和 0.193 p<0.140(MultiPeg 2)对于 III 型骨。

结论

本试验结果表明,PenguinRFA 具有出色的可重复性和再现性,因此在监测种植体随时间的稳定性方面非常有用。此外,根据结果,IT 和 RFA 之间的相关性较低,并且种植体类型之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4f/6764718/8ed99bad88c5/medoral-24-e636-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4f/6764718/8ed99bad88c5/medoral-24-e636-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4f/6764718/8ed99bad88c5/medoral-24-e636-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.
2
In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis.体外比较分析两种共振频率测量设备:Osstell 种植体稳定性测量仪和 Penguin 共振频率分析仪。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1111/cid.12868. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
3
A Comprehensive Study on Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) in View of Resonance Frequency and Spectrum Analysis.基于共振频率和频谱分析的种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)综合研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Aug 29;39(4):567-574. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10606.
4
Comparison of Reliability of 3 Resonance Frequency Analysis Devices: An In Vitro Study.三种共振频率分析设备可靠性的比较:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Feb 1;48(1):9-14. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00139.
5
Intra- and inter-operator concordance of the resonance frequency analysis. A cross-sectional and prospective clinical study.共振频率分析的操作者内和操作者间一致性。一项横断面和前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6521-6530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04601-y. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments.共振频率分析:两种临床仪器比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):308-312. doi: 10.1111/cid.12598. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
Resonance frequency analysis with two different devices after conventional implant placement with ridge preservation: A prospective pilot cohort study.在进行骨嵴保存的常规种植体植入后,使用两种不同设备进行共振频率分析:一项前瞻性试点队列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Oct;23(5):789-799. doi: 10.1111/cid.13031. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
8
Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.在植入负载的动物模型中对牙科种植体系统进行植入扭矩和共振频率分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):726-32.
9
In vitro comparison of resonance frequency analysis devices to evaluate implant stability of narrow diameter implants at varying drilling speeds in dense artificial bone blocks.在不同钻速下,评估密质人工骨块中窄直径种植体稳定性的共振频率分析装置的体外比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):1023-1027. doi: 10.1111/cid.12842. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
10
An in vitro study evaluating the efficacy of a novel mount with torque control designed to tighten Osstell® transducers.一项评估具有扭矩控制的新型安装座以拧紧 Osstell®传感器的有效性的体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Jun;9(3):411-417. doi: 10.1002/cre2.734. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Implant with Porous Structure and Anchorage: Design and Bench Testing in a Calf Rib Model Study.具有多孔结构和锚固功能的牙种植体:在小牛肋骨模型研究中的设计与台架试验
Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;18(3):700. doi: 10.3390/ma18030700.
2
Thermal necrosis-aided dental implant removal: A rabbit model pilot study.热坏死辅助拔牙:兔模型初步研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Mar 1;28(2):e148-e155. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25616.
3
Intra- and inter-operator concordance of the resonance frequency analysis. A cross-sectional and prospective clinical study.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation Between Resonance Frequency Analysis and Bone Quality Assessments at Dental Implant Recipient Sites.牙种植受植部位共振频率分析与骨质量评估之间的相关性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):180-187. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4684.
2
Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Conical Dental Implants in Relation to Insertion Torque-A Comparative Ex Vivo Evaluation.圆柱形和圆锥形牙种植体的初期稳定性与植入扭矩的关系——一项比较性体外评估
Implant Dent. 2017 Apr;26(2):250-255. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000531.
3
Does Length, Diameter, or Bone Quality Affect Primary and Secondary Stability in Self-Tapping Dental Implants?
共振频率分析的操作者内和操作者间一致性。一项横断面和前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6521-6530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04601-y. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
4
Assessment of Quality of Life and Supporting Structures in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Cohort Study.种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿的生活质量及支持结构评估:一项5年队列研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022 Jun 10;14:171-182. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S364814. eCollection 2022.
5
Effects of Different Undersizing Site Preparations on Implant Stability.不同尺寸减小的种植位点预备对种植体稳定性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 2;17(23):8965. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238965.
6
Evaluation of the primary stability in dental implants placed in low density bone with a new drilling technique, Osseodensification: an in vitro study.评价新型种植钻孔技术——骨强化(Osseodensification)在低骨密度条件下种植体的初期稳定性:一项体外研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 May 1;26(3):e361-e367. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24231.
7
Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study.新型跨上皮种植体基台共振频率分析值的可靠性:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 16;17(18):6733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186733.
8
Is It Possible to Monitor Implant Stability on a Prosthetic Abutment? An In Vitro Resonance Frequency Analysis.是否可以监测义齿基台上的种植体稳定性?体外共振频率分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;17(11):4073. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114073.
9
Relevant Design Aspects to Improve the Stability of Titanium Dental Implants.提高钛牙种植体稳定性的相关设计方面
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 18;13(8):1910. doi: 10.3390/ma13081910.
长度、直径或骨质会影响自攻式牙种植体的初期稳定性和二期稳定性吗?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1344-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
Relationship Between Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Measurements, Performed by Resonance Frequency Analysis, in Micromobility of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.通过共振频率分析进行的种植体微位移中植入扭矩与共振频率测量之间的关系:一项体外研究
Implant Dent. 2015 Oct;24(5):607-11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000318.
5
Assessment of the correlation between implant stability and bone density by computed tomography and resonance frequency analysis in fresh cadavers.通过计算机断层扫描和共振频率分析评估新鲜尸体中种植体稳定性与骨密度之间的相关性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):1264-70. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2607.
6
Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ.两种共振频率测量设备的比较分析:Osstell Mentor和Osstell ISQ。
Implant Dent. 2014 Jun;23(3):351-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000072.
7
Assessment of Osstell ISQ's reliability for implant stability measurement: a cross-sectional clinical study.评估 Osstell ISQ 用于种植体稳定性测量的可靠性:一项横断面临床研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Nov 1;18(6):e877-82. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19120.
8
Impact of bone quality and implant type on the primary stability: an experimental study using bovine bone.骨质量和种植体类型对初期稳定性的影响:一项使用牛骨的实验研究
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Apr;41(2):144-8. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00156. Epub 2013 May 28.
9
Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test.使用块状骨试验评估牙种植体植入扭矩与初期稳定性之间的相关性。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013 Feb;43(1):30-6. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2013.43.1.30. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
The relationship between resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and lateral displacement of dental implants: an in vitro study.共振频率分析(RFA)与牙种植体侧向位移的关系:一项体外研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Mar;40(3):221-7. doi: 10.1111/joor.12024. Epub 2012 Dec 28.