• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术治疗严重盆腔子宫内膜异位症。

Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thai-German Multidisciplinary Endoscopic Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Feb;116(2):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.022. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.022
PMID:22093496
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes-including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion-were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1 ± 48.7 minutes and 139.9 ± 52.4 minutes, respectively; P<0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6 ± 255.1 mL versus 760.9 ± 633.2 mL [P<0.001]; 3.5 ± 1.1 days versus 6.4 ± 3.0 days [P<0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [P<0.001], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)与剖腹子宫切除术(AH)治疗严重盆腔子宫内膜异位症患者的手术结局。

方法

回顾性分析 2002 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月期间因子宫内膜异位症接受子宫切除术的患者。共有 503 例患者患有严重盆腔子宫内膜异位症;其中 115 例行 LH,388 例行 AH。分析并比较了 2 组治疗患者的手术结局,包括手术时间、出血量、住院时间和输血需求。

结果

LH 的手术时间明显长于 AH(185.1 ± 48.7 分钟和 139.9 ± 52.4 分钟,P<0.001)。然而,LH 组患者的估计出血量、住院时间和并发症发生率明显低于 AH 组(302.6 ± 255.1 mL 比 760.9 ± 633.2 mL,P<0.001;3.5 ± 1.1 天比 6.4 ± 3.0 天,P<0.001;18.3%比 49.0%,P<0.001)。

结论

与 AH 相比,LH 并发症更少。因此,对于需要子宫切除术的严重盆腔子宫内膜异位症患者,LH 应作为首选手术方法。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术治疗严重盆腔子宫内膜异位症。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Feb;116(2):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.022. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
2
Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.腹腔镜子宫切除术:凯撒医疗集团圣地亚哥分院的经验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.022.
3
Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?全州市妇科肿瘤患者子宫切除术的途径与手术结果:阴道子宫切除术有作用吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):348.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
4
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.使用超声刀行全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.08.011.
5
Surgical Excision of Advanced Endometriosis: Perioperative Outcomes and Impacting Factors.晚期子宫内膜异位症的手术切除:围手术期结果及影响因素
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):944-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
6
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (≥1500 g): Feasibility and Outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫(≥1500克)女性良性疾病的可行性及结局
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 17.
7
Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术、经阴道子宫切除术及经腹子宫切除术的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;277(4):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0481-7. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
8
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments in patients with symptomatic leiomyoma and/or adenomyosis.经脐单切口腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术/子宫切除术联合传统腹腔镜器械治疗有症状的子宫肌瘤和/或子宫腺肌病。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Oct;284(4):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1770-0. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
9
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.评估子宫切除术试验:一项比较腹部、阴道和腹腔镜子宫切除方法的多中心随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(26):1-154. doi: 10.3310/hta8260.
10
Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与全阴道子宫切除术的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Nov;4(4):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00104.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Vagino-Laparoscopic Conservative Strategy of Hysterectomy in Indicated Cases of Severe Pelvic Endometriosis Followed by 24 Months of Depot-Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Therapy- A Symptom-Solving Treatment Model to Ease Surgical Challenges.严重盆腔子宫内膜异位症特定病例中行阴道-腹腔镜保守性子宫切除术并随后接受24个月醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射治疗的策略——一种缓解手术挑战的症状解决治疗模式
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Dec 5;15:1931-1940. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S437362. eCollection 2023.
2
Total or Subtotal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Endometriosis: A Review.全子宫切除术或次全子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜异位症:综述
J Clin Med. 2023 May 26;12(11):3697. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113697.
3
Correlations between Gut Microbial Composition, Pathophysiological and Surgical Aspects in Endometriosis: A Review of the Literature.
子宫内膜异位症中肠道微生物组成、病理生理和手术方面的相关性:文献综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 12;59(2):347. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020347.
4
Feasibility of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Stage IV Pelvic Endometriosis: Our Technique and Outcomes.腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗IV期盆腔子宫内膜异位症的可行性:我们的技术与结果
J Midlife Health. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):27-33. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_69_19. Epub 2020 May 4.
5
Completion of vaginal hysterectomy by electro surgery using anteroposterior approach in benign cases faced with obliterated posterior cul-de-sac.在良性病例中,面对后陷凹闭塞时,采用前后入路通过电外科手术完成阴道子宫切除术。
Int J Womens Health. 2018 Sep 17;10:529-536. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S171575. eCollection 2018.
6
Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划手术风险计算器在接受微创手术的妇科肿瘤患者中的评估
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
7
Radical Surgery for Endometriosis: Analysis of Quality of Life and Surgical Procedure.子宫内膜异位症的根治性手术:生活质量与手术过程分析
Clin Med Insights Womens Health. 2016 Mar 7;9:7-11. doi: 10.4137/CMWH.S38170. eCollection 2016.
8
Effect of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Pain in the Gynecologic Oncology Patient.腹腔注射布比卡因对妇科肿瘤患者术后疼痛的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(7):1260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
9
Use of Chinese medicine correlates negatively with the consumption of conventional medicine and medical cost in patients with uterine fibroids: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan.子宫肌瘤患者使用中药与传统药物消费及医疗费用呈负相关:台湾一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Apr 23;15:129. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0645-0.
10
Recurrence of endometriosis after hysterectomy.子宫切除术后子宫内膜异位症的复发
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6(4):219-27.