Suppr超能文献

超声心动图在左心室不同步量化中的作用:现状与未来方向。

The role of echocardiography in quantification of left ventricular dyssynchrony: state of the art and future directions.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Department of Cardiology and Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, N-0027 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;13(1):61-8. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer243. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

Abstract

This article discusses how echocardiography can be applied to quantify dyssynchrony in patients who are evaluated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). A number of echocardiographic indices have been proposed as markers of success of CRT. However, when tested against QRS width in prospective clinical trials, none of the echocardiographic indices are proven to give clinical benefit. One important message in this review is that future studies should focus on approaches which can differentiate between electrical and non-electrical aetiologies of dyssynchrony, since only electrical dyssynchrony is likely to respond to CRT. Just measuring velocity indices does not identify the aetiology. Myocardial strain appears more promising, but one should be aware that timing of peak systolic strain is determined not only by electrical conduction. It is proposed to use onset septal shortening during pre-ejection for timing of earliest left ventricular (LV) electrical activation. One should take into account potential ischaemia, scarring, and other structural changes as contributors to dyssynchrony. As a method to identify electrical dyssynchrony, the authors propose to use time of active force generation as defined by LV pressure-strain loops. A non-invasive method to measure segmental pressure-strain loops is also proposed as a means to quantify the impact of dyssynchrony on distribution of myocardial work. Furthermore, it is important to be aware that LV dyssynchrony may have a combination of aetiologies, not all amenable for CRT.

摘要

本文讨论了超声心动图如何应用于评估心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者的不同步性。已经提出了许多超声心动图指数作为 CRT 成功的标志物。然而,在前瞻性临床试验中,与 QRS 宽度进行测试时,没有任何超声心动图指数被证明具有临床获益。这篇综述的一个重要信息是,未来的研究应该集中在可以区分电和非电不同步病因的方法上,因为只有电不同步才可能对 CRT 有反应。仅仅测量速度指数并不能确定病因。心肌应变似乎更有前途,但应该意识到,收缩期应变峰值的时间不仅取决于电传导。有人建议在射血前期使用间隔缩短来确定左心室(LV)最早的电激活时间。应该考虑潜在的缺血、瘢痕和其他结构变化对不同步的影响。作为识别电不同步的一种方法,作者提出使用 LV 压力-应变环来定义主动力生成的时间。还提出了一种非侵入性的测量节段性压力-应变环的方法,作为量化不同步性对心肌做功分布影响的手段。此外,重要的是要意识到 LV 不同步可能有多种病因,并非所有病因都适合 CRT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验