Music Department, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA 16057, USA.
J Music Ther. 2011 Fall;48(3):289-316. doi: 10.1093/jmt/48.3.289.
This study surveyed 188 music therapy educators regarding their views and use of feminist pedagogy and feminist music therapy. The purpose of this study was two-fold: (a) to determine how many music therapy educators used feminist pedagogy and (b) to determine if there was a relationship between the use of feminist pedagogy and academic rank of the participants. Seventy-two participants responded to this study, with 69 participants included for data analysis. Stake and Hoffman's (2000) feminist pedagogy survey was adapted for this study, examining four subscales of feminist pedagogy: (a) participatory learning, (b) validation of personal experience/development of confidence, (c) political/ social activism, and (d) critical thinking/open-mindedness. The results revealed that 46% (n=32) of participants identified as feminist music therapists and 67% (n=46) of participants identified as using feminist pedagogy. Results of a mixed analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant difference within the four survey subscales (p<.0001), no significant difference (p=.32) for academic rank, and no significant interaction (p=.08) of academic rank and the four survey subscales. Tukey's post hoc analysis of the data indicated that the survey subscale measuring political activism (p<.0001) was significantly lower than the other three survey subscales. In addition, a qualitative analysis on open-ended responses is also included. Discussion of the results, limitations, and areas for future research are addressed.
本研究调查了 188 名音乐治疗教育者,了解他们对女性主义教育学和女性主义音乐治疗的看法和使用情况。本研究的目的有两个:(a) 确定有多少音乐治疗教育者使用了女性主义教育学;(b) 确定使用女性主义教育学与参与者的学术等级之间是否存在关系。有 72 名参与者对这项研究做出了回应,其中 69 名参与者的数据被纳入分析。本研究改编了 Stake 和 Hoffman(2000)的女性主义教育学调查,考察了女性主义教育学的四个亚量表:(a) 参与式学习;(b) 验证个人经验/培养自信;(c) 政治/社会行动主义;(d) 批判性思维/思想开放。结果表明,46%(n=32)的参与者自认为是女性主义音乐治疗师,67%(n=46)的参与者自认为在使用女性主义教育学。混合方差分析的结果显示,在四个调查亚量表中存在统计学上的显著差异(p<.0001),学术等级没有显著差异(p=.32),学术等级和四个调查亚量表之间也没有显著的相互作用(p=.08)。对数据的 Tukey 事后分析表明,衡量政治行动主义的调查亚量表(p<.0001)显著低于其他三个调查亚量表。此外,还包括对开放式回答的定性分析。讨论了研究结果、局限性和未来研究的方向。