• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟胚胎移植:一种可将胚胎移植问题降至最低并提高人类体外受精妊娠率的技术。

Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization.

作者信息

Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G

机构信息

Egyptian IVF-ET Center, Cairo University.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1990 Oct;54(4):678-81. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53829-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53829-1
PMID:2209889
Abstract

Three hundred thirty-five patients selected for in vitro fertilization (IVF) were randomly divided into two groups. Group A (n = 167) was subjected to dummy embryo transfer (ET) before the start of IVF treatment to choose the most suitable catheter for each patient. Group B (n = 168) started their IVF treatment without dummy ET. Embryo transfer technique was difficult in 50 cases (29.8%) in group B, whereas no difficulty was met in group A. Pregnancy rate and implantation rate (22.8%, 7.2%) in group A were significantly higher than in group B (13.1%, 4.3%). The lower pregnancy rate in group B is due to the very low pregnancy rate (4%) in difficult ET cases. Dummy ET is a simple procedure that determines the most suitable ET catheter for each patient and avoids unexpected difficult and failed ET.

摘要

335名接受体外受精(IVF)的患者被随机分为两组。A组(n = 167)在IVF治疗开始前进行模拟胚胎移植(ET),以便为每位患者选择最合适的导管。B组(n = 168)在未进行模拟ET的情况下开始IVF治疗。B组中有50例(29.8%)的胚胎移植技术困难,而A组未遇到困难。A组的妊娠率和着床率(22.8%,7.2%)显著高于B组(13.1%,4.3%)。B组较低的妊娠率是由于ET困难病例中的妊娠率非常低(4%)。模拟ET是一种简单的操作,可为每位患者确定最合适的ET导管,并避免意外的ET困难和失败。

相似文献

1
Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization.模拟胚胎移植:一种可将胚胎移植问题降至最低并提高人类体外受精妊娠率的技术。
Fertil Steril. 1990 Oct;54(4):678-81. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53829-1.
2
The choice of embryo transfer catheter affects embryo implantation after IVF.体外受精后,胚胎移植导管的选择会影响胚胎着床。
Fertil Steril. 2000 Oct;74(4):678-82. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00716-0.
3
The technique for human embryo transfer at Tygerberg Hospital.泰格堡医院的人类胚胎移植技术。
Acta Eur Fertil. 1986 Mar-Apr;17(2):117-9.
4
The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program.体外受精程序中导管的易移植性及类型对妊娠率和着床率的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Jan;19(1):14-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1014054421789.
5
Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome of IVF.移植技术和导管选择会影响经宫颈胚胎排出的发生率以及体外受精的结果。
Hum Reprod. 1999 Mar;14(3):677-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.3.677.
6
[Effect of catheter choice during embryo transfer on the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].胚胎移植时导管选择对体外受精-胚胎移植临床结局的影响
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Oct 18;48(5):905-909.
7
A prospective randomized controlled trial of Wallace and Rocket embryo transfer catheters.华莱士与罗克特胚胎移植导管的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Oct;17(4):549-52. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60243-x.
8
Difficulty of embryo-transfer (ET) and pregnancy rate based on the uterocervical angle.基于子宫颈角度的胚胎移植(ET)难度与妊娠率
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2008;35(1):16-21.
9
Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program.
Fertil Steril. 1989 Jul;52(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60793-8.
10
Marked improvement in clinical pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer seen when transfer technique and catheter were changed.当改变移植技术和导管时,体外受精-胚胎移植后的临床妊娠率有显著提高。
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2001;28(4):223-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal timing to transfer embryos for women who underwent hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.宫腔镜检查术后女性胚胎移植的最佳时机:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07511-5.
2
Steps forward in embryo transfer technique: a retrospective study comparing direct versus afterload catheters at different time frames.胚胎移植技术的新进展:不同时间段直接导管与后负荷导管的回顾性比较研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Dec;40(12):2895-2902. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02957-y. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Uterine factors modify the association between embryo transfer depth and clinical pregnancy.
子宫因素改变了胚胎移植深度与临床妊娠之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 22;12(1):14269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18636-4.
4
Administration of oxytocin antagonist at the same time as using a Foley catheter with cotton swab before embryo transfer for cervical stenosis.在宫颈狭窄患者胚胎移植前行 Foley 导尿管加棉签预处理时,同时给予缩宫素拮抗剂。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01409-y.
5
Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial.首次体外受精周期前模拟胚胎移植的结果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020 Nov 22;18(11):951-960. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction.对接受辅助生殖的不育妇女进行人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)的宫内给药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 20;10(10):CD011537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011537.pub3.
7
Does the Presence of Blood in the Catheter or the Degree of Difficulty of Embryo Transfer Affect Live Birth?导尿管中有血或胚胎移植的难度是否会影响活产?
Reprod Sci. 2017 May;24(5):726-730. doi: 10.1177/1933719116667607. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
8
Does catheter choice during embryo transfer alter the pregnancy rate?胚胎移植过程中导管的选择会改变妊娠率吗?
Med J Armed Forces India. 2011 Oct;67(4):311-4. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60074-9. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
9
Post-embryo transfer interventions for assisted reproduction technology cycles.辅助生殖技术周期的胚胎移植后干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 27;2014(8):CD006567. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006567.pub3.
10
Effect of the afterloaded external guidance embryo transfer technique on pregnancy rates in single embryo transfer cycles.后负荷体外引导胚胎移植技术对单胚胎移植周期妊娠率的影响。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Sep 1;14(3):153-6. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.49225. eCollection 2013.