Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
J Immunol Methods. 2012 Jan 31;375(1-2):264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
There is an increasing demand for convenient and accurate point-of-care tools that can detect and diagnose different stages of a disease in remote or impoverished settings. In recent years, lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) have been indicated as a suitable medical diagnostic tool for these environments because they require little or no sample preparation, provide rapid and reliable results with no electronic components and thus can be manufactured at low costs and operated by unskilled personnel. However, even though they have been successfully applied to acute and chronic disease detection, LFIA based on gold nanoparticles, the standard marker, show serious limitations when high sensitivity is needed, such as early stage disease detection. Moreover, based on the lack of comparative information for label performance, significant optimization of the systems that are currently in use might be possible. To this end, in the presented work, we compare the detection limit between the four most used labels: colloidal-gold, silver enhanced gold, blue latex bead and carbon black nanoparticles. Preliminary results were obtained by using the biotin-streptavidin coupling as a model system and showed that carbon black had a remarkably low detection limit of 0.01 μg/mL in comparison to 0.1 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL and 1mg/mL for silver-coated gold nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles and polystyrene beads, respectively. Therefore, as a proof of concept, carbon black was used in a detection system for Dengue fever. This was achieved by immobilizing monoclonal antibodies for the nonstructural glycoprotein (NS1) of the Dengue virus to carbon black. We found that the colorimetric detection limit of 57 ng/mL for carbon black was ten times lower than the 575 ng/mL observed for standard gold nanoparticles; which makes it sensitive enough to diagnose a patient on the first days of infection. We therefore conclude that, careful screening of detection labels should be performed as a necessary step during LFIA development in order to enhance the detection limit in a final test system.
人们对能够在远程或贫困环境中检测和诊断疾病不同阶段的便捷、准确的即时检测工具的需求日益增长。近年来,侧向流动免疫分析(LFIAs)因其所需的样本准备很少或无需准备、无需电子元件即可快速可靠地提供结果且成本低廉,因此被认为是这些环境下合适的医疗诊断工具。然而,尽管它们已成功应用于急性和慢性疾病检测,但基于金纳米粒子的 LFIAs 作为标准标记物,在需要高灵敏度的情况下,例如早期疾病检测,存在严重的局限性。此外,由于缺乏标签性能的比较信息,目前正在使用的系统可能需要进行重大优化。为此,在本工作中,我们比较了四种最常用的标记物(胶体金、银增强金、蓝色乳胶珠和炭黑纳米颗粒)的检测限。初步结果表明,使用生物素-亲和素偶联作为模型系统,炭黑的检测限低至 0.01μg/mL,而银包覆金纳米粒子、金纳米粒子和聚苯乙烯珠的检测限分别为 0.1μg/mL、1μg/mL 和 1mg/mL。因此,作为概念验证,炭黑被用于登革热检测系统。通过将针对登革病毒非结构糖蛋白(NS1)的单克隆抗体固定在炭黑上实现了这一点。我们发现,炭黑的比色检测限为 57ng/mL,比标准金纳米粒子的 575ng/mL 低十倍,足以在感染的最初几天诊断出患者。因此,我们得出结论,在 LFIAs 开发过程中,应仔细筛选检测标签,作为最终测试系统中提高检测限的必要步骤。