Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431-0991, United States.
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Jun 1;231(2):297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
Amphetamine and other stimulant drugs induce stereotyped head movements in rats, which interfere with normal goal-directed behavior. However, rats given access to food while intoxicated learn to suppress these movements in order to feed. This suggests that the suppression of stereotypy is an instrumentally learned response reinforced by the ingestion of food. Consistent with this interpretation, rats learn to suppress stereotyped head movements when intraoral infusions of milk are made contingent on maintaining a stationary head position, but not when such infusions are given noncontingently. Although learning to suppress stereotypy occurs at different rates across subjects, the temporal dynamics of learning are similar in all cases. Moreover, once learned suppression is acquired, it is generally retained over long periods of time unless the contingency between suppression and reinforcement is degraded. Conceptually, the behavioral conflict between drug-induced stereotyped movements and feeding may be viewed as a special case of the "selection problem," which arises whenever organisms are confronted with competing behavioral opportunities. Interestingly, both normal response selection and stimulant-induced stereotypy are associated with overlapping cortico-basal ganglia circuits. Preliminary findings suggest that the learned suppression of stereotypy involves the activation of particular structures within the dorsal and ventral striatal output pathways. Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying the learned suppression of stimulant-induced stereotypy may provide new insights into the process by which the nervous system solves the selection problem and lead to the development of more effective treatments for disorders characterized by insufficient response inhibition, such as Tourette's syndrome and stimulant drug addiction.
安非他命和其他兴奋剂会诱导老鼠出现刻板的头部运动,这会干扰正常的目标导向行为。然而,当老鼠在中毒时被允许进食,它们会学会抑制这些动作以进食。这表明,刻板行为的抑制是一种通过摄入食物得到强化的工具性习得反应。这种解释与以下事实一致:当口腔内的牛奶输注与保持头部静止位置相关联时,老鼠会学会抑制刻板的头部运动,但当这种输注是偶然发生时,老鼠不会学会抑制刻板的头部运动。尽管不同的老鼠在抑制刻板行为的学习速度上有所不同,但在所有情况下,学习的时间动态都是相似的。此外,一旦学会了抑制刻板行为,通常会在很长一段时间内保留下来,除非抑制和强化之间的关联被削弱。从概念上讲,药物引起的刻板运动和进食之间的行为冲突可以被视为“选择问题”的一个特殊情况,当生物体面临竞争行为机会时,就会出现选择问题。有趣的是,正常的反应选择和兴奋剂引起的刻板行为都与重叠的皮质基底节回路有关。初步研究结果表明,对刻板行为的习得抑制涉及到背侧和腹侧纹状体输出通路中特定结构的激活。了解兴奋剂诱导的刻板行为的习得抑制的神经机制可能为理解神经系统解决选择问题的过程提供新的见解,并导致开发出更有效的治疗方法,以治疗以反应抑制不足为特征的疾病,如妥瑞氏症和兴奋剂成瘾。