Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Jan;18(1):1-6. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110505. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
A systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare was undertaken from 1990 until September 2010. Twelve databases were searched, using economic evaluation terms combined with telemedicine terms. The search identified 80 studies which were classed as full economic evaluations; the majority (38) were cost-consequence analyses. There were 15 cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) and seven cost-utility analyses (CUA). In the period January 2004 to September 2010 there were 47 studies. Eleven were CEA and seven were CUA. Economic tools are being increasingly used for telemedicine and telecare studies, although better reporting of the methodologies and findings of the economic evaluations is required. Nonetheless, the results of the review were consistent with previous findings, i.e. there is no further conclusive evidence that telemedicine and telecare interventions are cost-effective compared to conventional health care.
从 1990 年到 2010 年 9 月,对远程医疗和远程保健的成本效益的研究进行了系统回顾。使用经济评估术语和远程医疗术语,搜索了 12 个数据库。搜索确定了 80 项被归类为全面经济评估的研究;其中大多数(38 项)是成本后果分析。有 15 项成本效益分析(CEA)和 7 项成本效用分析(CUA)。在 2004 年 1 月至 2010 年 9 月期间,有 47 项研究。其中 11 项是 CEA,7 项是 CUA。尽管需要更好地报告经济评估的方法和结果,但经济工具越来越多地用于远程医疗和远程保健研究。尽管如此,审查的结果与先前的发现一致,即没有进一步确凿的证据表明远程医疗和远程保健干预措施比传统医疗保健更具成本效益。