Department of Radiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Şükriye Mah. Ulucanlar Cad. TR-06340, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur Radiol. 2012 May;22(5):980-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2330-0. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
To compare time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with two-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance venography (MRV), and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced (CE) MRV in the visualisation of normal cerebral veins and dural venous sinuses.
This prospective study consisted of 35 consecutive patients. All patients were examined with TOF MRV, TRICKS MRA and CE MRV; a single dose of intravenous contrast material was administered for the last two sequences. The image quality of these techniques was assessed and compared qualitatively (by a semiquantitative scoring system) and quantitatively (by calculating signal-to-noise ratios [SNRs] and contrast-to-noise ratios [CNRs]).
Left transverse sinus, left sigmoid sinus, bilateral thalamostriate veins and Trolard veins were better visualised by TRICKS MRA and CE MRV compared with TOF MRV (P < 0.05). For left thalamostriate vein visualisation, TRICKS MRA was inferior to CE MRV (P < 0.05). With quantitative analysis the SNRs and CNRs were highest at TRICKS MRA, which was followed by CE MRV and TOF MRV (P < 0.05).
Despite its limited spatial resolution, TRICKS MRA is comparable to static CE MRV and better than TOF MRV in the visualisation of normal dural sinuses and cerebral veins.
• Time resolved magnetic resonance angiography can image the intracranial venous system dynamically • It seems comparable to contrast-enhanced MRV techniques in venous visualisation • The optimal phase for venous structures can be chosen from the dynamic data set • The diagnostic performance in venous thrombosis requires further research.
比较对比剂动力学时间分辨成像(TRICKS)磁共振血管造影(MRA)与二维时间飞跃(TOF)磁共振静脉造影(MRV)和三维对比增强(CE)MRV在正常脑静脉和硬脑膜静脉窦可视化中的应用。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 35 例连续患者。所有患者均接受 TOF MRV、TRICKS MRA 和 CE MRV 检查;后两种序列均静脉注射单次剂量对比剂。评估并比较了这些技术的图像质量,定性(采用半定量评分系统)和定量(通过计算信噪比 [SNR] 和对比噪声比 [CNR])。
与 TOF MRV 相比,TRICKS MRA 和 CE MRV 可更好地显示左侧横窦、左侧乙状窦、双侧丘脑纹状静脉和 Trolard 静脉(P<0.05)。对于左侧丘脑纹状静脉的显示,TRICKS MRA 逊于 CE MRV(P<0.05)。定量分析显示,TRICKS MRA 的 SNR 和 CNR 最高,其次是 CE MRV 和 TOF MRV(P<0.05)。
尽管 TRICKS MRA 的空间分辨率有限,但在硬脑膜窦和脑静脉的可视化方面,它与静态 CE MRV 相当,优于 TOF MRV。
• 时间分辨磁共振血管造影可以动态成像颅内静脉系统
• 它在静脉可视化方面似乎与对比增强 MRV 技术相当
• 可以从动态数据集选择静脉结构的最佳相位
• 静脉血栓形成的诊断性能需要进一步研究。