Suppr超能文献

霍乱患者接触者的化学预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Chemoprophylaxis in contacts of patients with cholera: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Public Policies and Research for Health-Health Systems based on Primary Health Care, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027060. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a pressing need for effective measures to prevent the spread of cholera. Our systematic review assesses the effects of chemoprophylaxis in preventing cholera among exposed contacts.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We considered published and unpublished reports of studies up to July 2011. For this we searched: PubMed (1966 to July, 2011), Embase (1980 to July 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (6; 2011), LILACS (1982 to July, 2011), the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (July 2011) and references of identified publications. We included controlled clinical trials (randomized and non-randomized) in which chemoprophylaxis was used to prevent cholera among patient contacts. The main outcome measures were hospitalization and laboratory diagnosis of cholera in contacts for cholera patients. We assessed the risk of bias. We identified 2638 references and these included 2 randomized trials and 5 controlled trials that added up to a total of 4,154 participants. The risk of bias scored high for most trials. The combined results from two trials found that chemoprophylaxis reduced hospitalization of contacts during the follow-up period by 8-12 days (2826 participants; RR 0.54 95% CI 0.40-0.74;I² 0%). A meta-analysis of five trials found a significant reduction in disease among contacts with at least one positive sample who received chemoprophylaxis during the overall follow-up (range 4-15 days) (1,414 participants; RR 0.35 95% CI 0.18-0.66;I² 74%). A significant reduction in the number of positive samples was also found with chemoprophylaxis (3 CCT; 6,918 samples; RR 0.39 95% CI 0.29-0.51;I² 0%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that chemoprophylaxis has a protective effect among household contacts of people with cholera but the results are based on studies with a high risk of bias. Hence, there is a need for adequate reliable research that allows balancing benefits and harms by evaluating the effects of chemoprophylaxis.

摘要

引言

急需采取有效措施来阻止霍乱的传播。我们的系统评价评估了化学预防措施在预防暴露接触者感染霍乱中的效果。

方法和发现

我们考虑了截至 2011 年 7 月的已发表和未发表的研究报告。为此,我们搜索了:PubMed(1966 年至 2011 年 7 月)、Embase(1980 年至 2011 年 7 月)、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册(2011 年 6 月)、LILACS(1982 年至 2011 年 7 月)、国际临床试验注册平台(2011 年 7 月)和已确定出版物的参考文献。我们纳入了使用化学预防措施预防霍乱患者接触者感染霍乱的对照临床试验(随机和非随机)。主要结局指标为接触者住院和实验室诊断霍乱。我们评估了偏倚风险。我们确定了 2638 篇参考文献,其中包括 2 项随机试验和 5 项对照试验,总计 4154 名参与者。大多数试验的偏倚风险评分较高。两项试验的联合结果发现,化学预防措施可将接触者的住院时间减少 8-12 天(2826 名参与者;RR 0.54,95%CI 0.40-0.74;I² 0%)。五项试验的荟萃分析发现,在整个随访期间(4-15 天)接受化学预防的至少有一个阳性样本的接触者中,疾病的发生率显著降低(1414 名参与者;RR 0.35,95%CI 0.18-0.66;I² 74%)。用化学预防措施也发现阳性样本数量显著减少(3 项 CCT;6918 个样本;RR 0.39,95%CI 0.29-0.51;I² 0%)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,化学预防措施对霍乱患者的家庭接触者具有保护作用,但这些结果基于存在高偏倚风险的研究。因此,需要进行充分可靠的研究,通过评估化学预防措施的效果来权衡利弊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d91/3216950/8be787cc09c3/pone.0027060.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验