Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Jan;24(1):54-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01812.x. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
The advent of drugs that inhibit transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) necessitates accurate identification and scoring. We assessed the intra- and inter-assessor variability of the existing objective criteria for TLESR, improving them where necessary.
Two 3-h postprandial esophageal manometric and pH recordings were performed in 20 healthy volunteers. Each recording was duplicated. The recordings were analyzed by five experienced observers for TLESRs based on their expert opinion. TLESRs were also analyzed for the presence of the original four criteria as well as inhibition of the crural diaphragm (ID), a prominent after-contraction (AC), acid reflux and an esophageal common cavity.
The overall inter- and intra-observer agreements for TLESRs scored, according to observer's expert opinion, were 59% (range 56-67%) and 74% (60-89%), respectively. When TLESRs were restricted to those fulfilling the original criteria, these agreements fell to 46% (40-53%) and 60% (44-67%), respectively. Cleaning the recordings by removal of technically flawed sections improved agreements by 5%. Inclusion of additional criteria (ID and AC) resulted in inter- and intra-observer agreements of 62% (52-70%) and 69% (53-79%), respectively. A consensus analysis performed collectively by three observers and based on the new criteria (original ± ID and AC) resulted in 84% agreement between the paired recordings.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The original criteria for the definition of TLESRs allows for substantial inter- and intra-observer variability, which can be reduced by incorporation of additional objective criteria. However, the highest level of intra-observer agreement can be achieved by consensus analysis.
抑制瞬时食管下括约肌松弛(TLESR)的药物的出现需要准确的识别和评分。我们评估了现有的 TLESR 客观标准的内部和观察者间变异性,并在必要时进行了改进。
对 20 名健康志愿者进行了 2 次餐后 3 小时食管测压和 pH 记录。每个记录都进行了重复。根据专家意见,5 名有经验的观察者对记录进行了 TLESR 的分析。还分析了 TLESR 是否存在原始的四个标准,以及是否抑制了膈脚(ID)、明显的继收缩(AC)、酸反流和食管共同腔。
根据观察者的专家意见,对 TLESR 进行评分的总体观察者间和观察者内协议分别为 59%(范围为 56-67%)和 74%(60-89%)。当 TLESR 仅限于符合原始标准的 TLESR 时,这些协议分别降至 46%(40-53%)和 60%(44-67%)。通过删除技术上有缺陷的部分来清理记录可将协议提高 5%。纳入其他标准(ID 和 AC)可使观察者间和观察者内的协议分别提高到 62%(52-70%)和 69%(53-79%)。由三名观察者共同进行的共识分析,基于新的标准(原始±ID 和 AC),导致配对记录之间的协议为 84%。
TLESR 定义的原始标准允许观察者间和观察者内存在很大的变异性,通过纳入其他客观标准可以减少这种变异性。然而,通过共识分析可以达到最高水平的观察者内一致性。