良性阵发性位置性眩晕:前庭诱发肌源性电位测试有用吗?
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: is vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing useful?
作者信息
Longo Giovanni, Onofri Marina, Pellicciari Teresa, Quaranta Nicola
机构信息
Otolaryngology Unit, University of Bari "A. Moro", Italy.
出版信息
Acta Otolaryngol. 2012 Jan;132(1):39-43. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.619570. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
CONCLUSIONS
In benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) help to better define the extent of saccular damage and the patient's prognosis.
OBJECTIVES
To report the results of VEMPs in patients affected by BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal (PSC) in order to evaluate the presence of signs of saccular dysfunction compared to the normal population and to correlate them with the clinical picture.
METHODS
This was a prospective study in a tertiary referral center; 23 patients affected by BPPV of the PSC and 24 controls were evaluated. All patients underwent complete clinical history and otoneurologic and audiovestibular evaluation consisting of pure-tone audiometry, caloric testing, and registration of VEMPs.
RESULTS
VEMP thresholds and latencies were not different between patients and controls. As a group BPPV patients presented significantly higher abnormal VEMPs compared with controls (p < 0.001). Age positively correlated with VEMP threshold in the affected ear of patients and in controls; the number of BPPV attacks positively correlated with threshold and negatively with amplitude of VEMPs in the affected ear; duration of the last attack was negatively correlated with the effect of the maneuver performed.
结论
在良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)中,前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMPs)有助于更好地确定球囊损伤程度和患者预后。
目的
报告后半规管(PSC)BPPV患者的VEMPs结果,以便评估与正常人群相比球囊功能障碍体征的存在情况,并将其与临床表现相关联。
方法
这是一项在三级转诊中心进行的前瞻性研究;对23例PSC的BPPV患者和24例对照进行了评估。所有患者均接受了完整的临床病史以及耳神经学和听前庭评估,包括纯音听力测定、冷热试验和VEMPs记录。
结果
患者和对照之间的VEMP阈值和潜伏期没有差异。作为一个群体,BPPV患者的异常VEMPs明显高于对照(p < 0.001)。年龄与患者患耳和对照患耳的VEMP阈值呈正相关;BPPV发作次数与患耳VEMP阈值呈正相关,与患耳VEMP波幅呈负相关;最后一次发作的持续时间与所进行手法的效果呈负相关。