Suppr超能文献

通过增加刺激频率,电诱导肌肉痉挛的持续时间会增加。

Duration of electrically induced muscle cramp increased by increasing stimulation frequency.

作者信息

Miller Kevin C, Knight Kenneth L, Wilding Steven R, Stone Marcus B

机构信息

Dept of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2012 May;21(2):182-5. doi: 10.1123/jsr.21.2.182. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Electrically induced muscle cramps (EIMC) do not last long enough to study many cramp treatments. Increasing stimulation frequency lengthens cramp duration; it is unknown which frequency elicits the longest EIMC.

OBJECTIVE

To determine which stimulation frequency elicits the longest EIMC and whether cramp duration and stimulation frequency are correlated.

DESIGN

Randomized, crossover.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

20 participants (12 male, 8 female; age 20.7 ± 0.6 y; height 174.9 ± 1.9 cm; mass 76.6 ± 2.2 kg) with a self-reported history of muscle cramps in their lower extremities within the 6 mo before the study.

INTERVENTIONS

The dominant leg's tibial nerve was percutaneously stimulated with 2-s-duration electrical stimuli trains starting at a frequency of 4 Hz. After 1 min of rest, stimulation frequency increased in 2-Hz increments until a cramp occurred in the flexor hallucis brevis. The stimulation frequency at which a cramp occurred was termed cramp threshold frequency (TF). Cramp duration was determined using strict clinical criteria (loss of hallux rigidity and return of hallux neutral). On the next 4 consecutive days, participants were stimulated at 5, 10, 15, or 20 Hz above TF, and cramp duration was reassessed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cramp TF and duration.

RESULTS

Cramp TF was 16.9 ± 5.1 Hz. Cramp duration was longer at 15 and 20 Hz above TF (77.9 ± 37.6 s and 69.5 ± 36.9 s, respectively) than at TF (40.8 ± 34.0 s; P < .05). Cramp duration and TF were highly correlated (r = .90).

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulating at 15 and 20 Hz above cramp TF produces the longest-lasting EIMC.

摘要

背景

电诱发肌肉痉挛(EIMC)持续时间不够长,无法对多种痉挛治疗方法进行研究。增加刺激频率可延长痉挛持续时间;目前尚不清楚哪种频率能引发最长的EIMC。

目的

确定哪种刺激频率能引发最长的EIMC,以及痉挛持续时间与刺激频率是否相关。

设计

随机交叉试验。

地点

实验室。

参与者

20名参与者(12名男性,8名女性;年龄20.7±0.6岁;身高174.9±1.9厘米;体重76.6±2.2千克),在研究前6个月内有下肢肌肉痉挛的自我报告病史。

干预措施

对优势腿的胫神经进行经皮刺激,使用持续2秒的电刺激序列,起始频率为4赫兹。休息1分钟后,刺激频率以2赫兹的增量增加,直到拇短屈肌出现痉挛。发生痉挛时的刺激频率称为痉挛阈值频率(TF)。使用严格的临床标准(拇趾僵硬消失和拇趾恢复中立)确定痉挛持续时间。在接下来连续4天,参与者在高于TF 5、10、15或20赫兹的频率下接受刺激,并重新评估痉挛持续时间。

主要观察指标

痉挛TF和持续时间。

结果

痉挛TF为16.9±5.1赫兹。高于TF 15和20赫兹时的痉挛持续时间(分别为77.9±37.6秒和69.5±36.9秒)比TF时(40.8±34.0秒)更长(P<0.05)。痉挛持续时间与TF高度相关(r = 0.90)。

结论

在高于痉挛TF 15和20赫兹的频率下进行刺激可产生持续时间最长的EIMC。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验