Suppr超能文献

急性被动静态伸展和抽筋阈值频率。

Acute Passive Static Stretching and Cramp Threshold Frequency.

机构信息

George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2017 Oct;52(10):918-924. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.7.03. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Exercise-associated muscle cramps are a common clinical problem for athletes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether acute passive static stretching altered cramp threshold frequency (CTF) of electrically induced muscle cramps.

DESIGN

Crossover study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen healthy college-aged individuals.

INTERVENTION(S): Stretching or no stretching.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The independent variable was the static stretch versus the no-stretch condition, and the dependent variable was the CTF.

RESULTS

The CTF increased in both the control (pretest: 18.12 ± 6.46 Hz, posttest: 19.65 ± 7.25 Hz; P = .033) and stretching (pretest: 18.94 ± 5.96 Hz, posttest: 20.47 ± 7.12 Hz; P = .049) groups. No difference between the groups was found (t = 0.035, P = .97).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute passive static stretching did not seem to increase the CTF.

摘要

背景

运动相关性肌肉痉挛是运动员常见的临床问题。

目的

确定急性被动静态伸展是否改变电诱发肌肉痉挛的痉挛阈值频率(CTF)。

设计

交叉研究。

设置

实验室。

患者或其他参与者

17 名健康的大学生。

干预措施

拉伸或不拉伸。

主要观察指标

独立变量为静态拉伸与无拉伸状态,因变量为 CTF。

结果

在对照组(预测试:18.12 ± 6.46 Hz,后测试:19.65 ± 7.25 Hz;P =.033)和拉伸组(预测试:18.94 ± 5.96 Hz,后测试:20.47 ± 7.12 Hz;P =.049)中,CTF 均增加。两组之间无差异(t = 0.035,P =.97)。

结论

急性被动静态拉伸似乎不会增加 CTF。

相似文献

1
Acute Passive Static Stretching and Cramp Threshold Frequency.急性被动静态伸展和抽筋阈值频率。
J Athl Train. 2017 Oct;52(10):918-924. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.7.03. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
3
Prophylactic stretching does not reduce cramp susceptibility.预防性伸展并不能降低抽筋的易感性。
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Mar;57(3):473-477. doi: 10.1002/mus.25762. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验