Suppr超能文献

经肛内入路前列腺根治术后治疗压力性尿失禁的男性吊带:单中心前瞻性研究的中期结果。

The inside-out transobturator male sling for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: midterm results of a single-center prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.036. Epub 2011 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transobturator slings are currently promoted for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), but data on outcome remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess, at midterm, the efficacy and safety of the inside-out transobturator male sling for treating post-RP SUI and to determine factors associated with failure.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective one-center trial involving 173 consecutive patients without detrusor overactivity, treated between 2006 and 2011 for SUI following RP.

INTERVENTION

Placement of an inside-out transobturator sling.

MEASUREMENTS

Baseline and follow-up evaluations included uroflowmetry and continence and quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires. Cure was defined as no pad use and improvement as a number of pads per day reduced by ≥50% and two or fewer pads. Complications were recorded, and factors associated with treatment failure were evaluated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Preoperatively, 21%, 35%, and 44% of the patients were using two, three to five, and more than five pads per day, respectively. After a median follow-up of 24 mo (range: 12-60 mo), 49% were cured, 35% improved, and 16% not improved. QoL was enhanced (p<0.001), and 72% of patients were moderately to completely satisfied with the procedure. Maximum flow rates were slightly reduced (p=0.004); postvoid residual volumes were similar (p=0.097). Complications were urinary retention after catheter removal (15%), perineal/scrotal hematoma (9%), pain lasting >6 mo (3%), and sling infection (2%); all were managed conservatively. Severe SUI before sling surgery was not associated with a worse outcome, whereas obesity and a history of pelvic irradiation or bladder neck stenosis were independent risk factors of failure, with risk ratios of 7.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-18.9), 3.3 (95% CI, 1.4-7.8), and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.1-6.5), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The inside-out transobturator male sling is an efficient and safe treatment for post-RP SUI at midterm. Patients with prior pelvic irradiation may not be suitable candidates.

摘要

背景

经闭孔尿道吊带目前被推荐用于治疗根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)的压力性尿失禁(SUI),但关于疗效的数据仍然有限。

目的

评估经闭孔尿道内吊带治疗 RP 后 SUI 的中期疗效和安全性,并确定与失败相关的因素。

设计、地点和参与者:前瞻性单中心试验,纳入 2006 年至 2011 年间因 RP 后 SUI 接受治疗的 173 例连续患者,无逼尿肌过度活动,无尿道狭窄。

干预

放置经闭孔尿道内吊带。

测量

基线和随访评估包括尿流率和控尿及生活质量(QoL)问卷。治愈定义为不使用尿垫,且每日尿垫使用量减少≥50%且少于 2 个。记录并发症,并评估与治疗失败相关的因素。

结果和局限性

术前,分别有 21%、35%和 44%的患者每天使用 2 个、3-5 个和 5 个以上尿垫。中位随访 24 个月(范围:12-60 个月)后,49%的患者治愈,35%的患者改善,16%的患者无改善。QoL 得到改善(p<0.001),72%的患者对手术过程中度至非常满意。最大尿流率略有降低(p=0.004);剩余尿量相似(p=0.097)。并发症包括拔尿管后尿潴留(15%)、会阴/阴囊血肿(9%)、疼痛持续>6 个月(3%)和吊带感染(2%);所有并发症均保守治疗。吊带手术前严重 SUI 与结局不佳无关,而肥胖、盆腔放疗或膀胱颈狭窄史是失败的独立危险因素,风险比分别为 7.9(95%置信区间[CI],3.3-18.9)、3.3(95%CI,1.4-7.8)和 2.6(95%CI,1.1-6.5)。

结论

经闭孔尿道内吊带是 RP 后 SUI 的一种有效、安全的中期治疗方法。既往盆腔放疗的患者可能不适合该手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验