Suppr超能文献

开发决策分析框架以确定手术室容量优先级:从荷兰一家医院在 COVID-19 大流行期间延迟择期手术的经验中获得的经验教训。

Development of a decision analytical framework to prioritise operating room capacity: lessons learnt from an empirical example on delayed elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e054110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054110.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a prioritisation framework to support priority setting for elective surgeries after COVID-19 based on the impact on patient well-being and cost.

DESIGN

We developed decision analytical models to estimate the consequences of delayed elective surgical procedures (eg, total hip replacement, bariatric surgery or septoplasty).

SETTING

The framework was applied to a large hospital in the Netherlands.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality measures impacts on quality of life and costs were taken into account and combined to calculate net monetary losses per week delay, which quantifies the total loss for society expressed in monetary terms. Net monetary losses were weighted by operating times.

RESULTS

We studied 13 common elective procedures from four specialties. Highest loss in quality of life due to delayed surgery was found for total hip replacement (utility loss of 0.27, ie, 99 days lost in perfect health); the lowest for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (utility loss of 0.05, ie, 18 days lost in perfect health). Costs of surgical delay per patient were highest for bariatric surgery (€31/pp per week) and lowest for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (-€2/pp per week). Weighted by operating room (OR) time bariatric surgery provides most value (€1.19/pp per OR minute) and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy provides the least value (€0.34/pp per OR minute). In a large hospital the net monetary loss due to prolonged waiting times was €700 840 after the first COVID-19 wave, an increase of 506% compared with the year before.

CONCLUSIONS

This surgical prioritisation framework can be tailored to specific centres and countries to support priority setting for delayed elective operations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, both in and between surgical disciplines. In the long-term, the framework can contribute to the efficient distribution of OR time and will therefore add to the discussion on appropriate use of healthcare budgets. The online framework can be accessed via: https://stanwijn.shinyapps.io/priORitize/.

摘要

目的

基于对患者健康和成本的影响,制定一个优先框架,以支持 COVID-19 后择期手术的优先级设置。

设计

我们开发了决策分析模型来估计延迟择期手术程序的后果(例如全髋关节置换术、减肥手术或鼻中隔成形术)。

设置

该框架应用于荷兰的一家大医院。

结果衡量

纳入并综合了质量措施对生活质量和成本的影响,以计算每周延迟的净货币损失,该损失以货币形式量化了社会的总损失。净货币损失按手术时间加权。

结果

我们研究了来自四个专业的 13 种常见的择期手术。由于手术延迟而导致的生活质量损失最大的是全髋关节置换术(效用损失 0.27,即完美健康状态下损失 99 天);最低的是关节镜下半月板部分切除术(效用损失 0.05,即完美健康状态下损失 18 天)。每位患者的手术延迟成本最高的是减肥手术(€31/人/周),最低的是关节镜下半月板部分切除术(-€2/人/周)。按手术室(OR)时间加权,减肥手术提供的价值最高(€1.19/人/OR 分钟),关节镜下半月板部分切除术提供的价值最低(€0.34/人/OR 分钟)。在一家大医院,第一次 COVID-19 浪潮后,由于等待时间延长,净货币损失为 700840 欧元,比前一年增加了 506%。

结论

该手术优先级框架可以根据特定的中心和国家进行调整,以支持 COVID-19 期间和之后延迟的择期手术的优先级设置,涵盖手术学科内和学科之间。从长远来看,该框架有助于有效分配 OR 时间,因此将有助于讨论适当使用医疗保健预算。该在线框架可通过以下网址访问:https://stanwijn.shinyapps.io/priORitize/。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0420/8995574/3647c9a94afd/bmjopen-2021-054110f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验