Suppr超能文献

受伤驾驶员群体中处方药的使用情况与撞车罪责

Prescription medication usage and crash culpability in a population of injured drivers.

作者信息

Dischinger Patricia, Li Jingyi, Smith Gordon S, Ho Shiu, Auman Kimberly, Shojai Dawn

机构信息

National Study Center for Trauma & EMS, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:207-16.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

There has been increasing concern regarding the role of prescription drug use in the causation of traffic crashes. The goal of this research is to describe the prevalence of prescription drug use among injured trauma patients and determine the association between classes of drugs and crash culpability, a surrogate measure of crash risk.

METHODS

Patient records, including chronic medication usage, for all drivers admitted to a trauma center following a traffic collision in 2008 (N=1,558) were linked with police crash reports to determine crash culpability. Multivariable analyses explored the association between medication use and crash culpability among non-drinking drivers. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were compared among drivers who were and were not using central nervous system (CNS)-acting medications (single and multiple).

RESULTS

61.5% of all drivers were using any medications and usage increased with age, as did numbers of prescriptions per driver. Logistic regression analyses revealed that drivers who used CNS medications had an increased risk of culpability; those on more than one such medication had a crude (unadjusted) odds ratio of 2.16 for having caused the crash. Among drivers less than 45 years old, CNS medications did not significantly increase the risk of crash culpability. However, among drivers aged 45 or greater, the odds ratios for one, two, or 2+ CNS medications vs. none increased dramatically from 1.89 to 4.23 to 7.99, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that special attention should be given to older drivers (45+) using two or more CNS-acting agents.

摘要

未标注

人们越来越关注处方药在交通事故成因中所起的作用。本研究的目的是描述受伤创伤患者中使用处方药的流行情况,并确定药物类别与撞车罪责之间的关联,撞车罪责是撞车风险的一项替代指标。

方法

将2008年因交通事故入院的所有驾驶员(N = 1558)的患者记录(包括慢性药物使用情况)与警方撞车报告相联系,以确定撞车罪责。多变量分析探讨了非饮酒驾驶员中药物使用与撞车罪责之间的关联。比较了使用和未使用中枢神经系统(CNS)作用药物(单一和多种)的驾驶员的调整后比值比和95%置信区间。

结果

所有驾驶员中有61.5%正在使用任何药物,且使用率随年龄增长而增加,每位驾驶员的处方数量也是如此。逻辑回归分析显示,使用CNS药物的驾驶员撞车罪责风险增加;使用不止一种此类药物的驾驶员造成撞车的粗(未调整)比值比为2.16。在45岁以下的驾驶员中,CNS药物并未显著增加撞车罪责风险。然而,在45岁及以上的驾驶员中,使用一种、两种或两种以上CNS药物与未使用药物相比的比值比分别从1.89急剧增加到4.23再到7.99。

结论

这些结果表明,应特别关注使用两种或更多中枢神经系统作用药物的老年驾驶员(45岁及以上)。

相似文献

3
Cell phone use and traffic crash risk: a culpability analysis.手机使用与交通事故风险:责任分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):259-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys180. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
4
Development and validation of a crash culpability scoring tool.开发和验证碰撞罪责评分工具。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(3):219-29. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.645383.

本文引用的文献

7
Medication reconciliation: challenges and opportunities.用药核对:挑战与机遇
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Sep 15;64(18):1912. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060622.
9
Using medication reconciliation to prevent errors.利用用药核对来预防差错。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Apr;32(4):230-2. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32030-2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验