Lee Seyoung, Kim Hyoung-Ryoul, Byun Junsu, Jang Taewon
Department of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 137701 Republic of Korea.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2017 Oct 9;29:48. doi: 10.1186/s40557-017-0203-y. eCollection 2017.
Sleepiness while driving has been regarded as a major cause of death due to traffic accidents. We compared the degree of sleepiness across five different working time periods (first, morning, post-lunch, afternoon, and last) among Korean bus drivers with different shift types (Daily two shift/Alternating day shift).
We interviewed 332 bus drivers with two shift types (Daily two shift, 128; Alternating day shift, 204). The questionnaire included demographic information (age, alcohol consumption and history of disease), a sleep disorder diagnosed by a doctor, job duration, the number of workdays in the past month, average working hours per workday and week, sleepiness while driving (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale), and sleeping time for both workdays and off-days. We conducted log-binomial regression analyses and produced prevalence ratios (PRs) of severe sleepiness (KSS ≥ 7) while driving with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to identify the difference in sleepiness for five working times between both groups.
For the first and morning periods, there were no statistically significant differences in the KSS scores between the two groups. However, from lunch to last driving, drivers with Alternating day shift had a much larger proportion of severe sleepiness than those on Daily two shift. Thirteen (10.2%), 2 (1.6%) and 7 (5.5%) Daily two shift workers reported severe sleepiness in the post-lunch, afternoon and last periods. In contrast, 81 (39.7%), 63 (30.9%) and 64 (31.4%) of Alternating day shift drivers experienced severe sleepiness during the post-lunch, afternoon and last driving periods ( < 0.0001). According to the log-binomial regression analyses, Alternating day shift was associated with severe sleepiness from lunch to last driving. After adjusting for job duration, alcohol consumption and sleeping time on workdays, the PRs were 3.97 (95% CI: 2.29-6.90) post-lunch, 18.26 (95% CI: 4.51-73.89) in the afternoon and 5.71 (95% CI: 2.51-12.99) for the last driving period.
We found that Alternating day shift bus drivers suffered from more sleepiness while driving from lunch to last driving than Daily two shift bus drivers. This difference may be because Alternating day shift drivers had more irregular work schedules and longer working hours per day and week.
驾驶时困倦被视为交通事故致死的主要原因之一。我们比较了不同轮班类型(每日双班/隔日轮班)的韩国公交车司机在五个不同工作时间段(首个、上午、午餐后、下午和最后一个)的困倦程度。
我们对332名具有两种轮班类型的公交车司机进行了访谈(每日双班,128人;隔日轮班,204人)。问卷包括人口统计学信息(年龄、饮酒情况和疾病史)、医生诊断的睡眠障碍、工作时长、过去一个月的工作日数量、每个工作日和每周的平均工作小时数、驾驶时的困倦程度(卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表)以及工作日和休息日的睡眠时间。我们进行了对数二项回归分析,并得出驾驶时严重困倦(KSS≥7)的患病率比(PRs)及95%置信区间(95%CI),以确定两组在五个工作时间段的困倦差异。
在首个和上午时间段,两组的KSS评分无统计学显著差异。然而,从午餐后到最后一段驾驶时间,隔日轮班的司机严重困倦的比例远高于每日双班的司机。13名(10.2%)、2名(1.6%)和7名(5.5%)每日双班车司机在午餐后、下午和最后时间段报告有严重困倦。相比之下,81名(39.7%)、63名(30.9%)和64名(31.4%)隔日轮班车司机在午餐后、下午和最后驾驶时间段经历了严重困倦(P<0.0001)。根据对数二项回归分析,隔日轮班与午餐后到最后驾驶期间的严重困倦有关。在调整工作时长、饮酒情况和工作日睡眠时间后,午餐后的PR为3.97(95%CI:2.29 - 6.90),下午为18.26(95%CI:4.51 - 73.89),最后驾驶时间段为5.71(95%CI:2.51 - 12.99)。
我们发现,从午餐后到最后驾驶期间,隔日轮班的公交车司机比每日双班的公交车司机更容易困倦。这种差异可能是因为隔日轮班的司机工作时间表更不规律,且每天和每周的工作时间更长。