Gadegbeku Blandine, Amoros Emmanuelle, Laumon Bernard
(Transport, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Research and Surveillance Unit) Ifsttar, Umrestte, UMR T 9405, Bron, F-69675, France; Université de Lyon, Lyon, F-69003, France; SAM Group : MB Biecheler, P Chapuis, C Filou, K Fouquet, Y Gourlet, JL Martin, E Perez, JF Peytavin, P Van Elslande (INRETS), L Campione, R Driscoll, T Hermitte, T Phalempin, D Villeforceix (CEESAR), JY Forêt-Bruno, Y Page (LAB PSA Peugeot-Citroën/Renault), F Facy, M Rabaud (INSERM), H Martineau (OFDT) and C Got.
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:293-300.
In 1999, in France, before considering modifications in drug legislation, the government requested a study of the effect of illicit drugs on the risk of road crashes. It implemented a systematic screening of illicit drugs for all drivers involved in fatal crashes between October 2001 and September 2003. Within the European DRUID project, the study was restricted to car drivers.The project reported here is a responsibility analysis and, as such, it belongs to the framework of case-control studies; the outcome of interest is "being responsible for a fatal crash". It was assessed with a method adapted from Robertson and Drummer. Cases are the 4,946 car drivers who are responsible for the crash; controls are the 1,986 car drivers selected from the non-responsible car drivers, in a way that makes the control group similar to the general driving population.The effect of cannabis on fatal crash responsibility is significant after adjustment for age, sex and alcohol: adjusted odds ratio is 1.89 [1.43-2.51]. The dose-response effect is significant (p=0.0001). For alcohol (≥0.1 g/l), the adjusted odds ratio for responsibility is 8.39 [6.95-10.11]. No interaction was found between alcohol and cannabis. For amphetamine, cocaine and opiates, adjusted odds ratios were not significantly different from 1. However the statistical power is low.The study finds similar odds ratios for alcohol as previously published. For cannabis, the significant odds ratio together with the significant dose-response effect indicates a causal relationship between cannabis and road crashes. A multiplicative effect between cannabis and alcohol was noted.
1999年,在法国,在考虑修改药品立法之前,政府要求对非法药物对道路交通事故风险的影响进行一项研究。它对2001年10月至2003年9月期间所有涉及致命事故的司机进行了非法药物的系统筛查。在欧洲DRUID项目中,该研究仅限于汽车司机。这里报告的项目是一项责任分析,因此,它属于病例对照研究的框架;感兴趣的结果是“对致命事故负责”。它是用一种改编自罗伯逊和德鲁默的方法进行评估的。病例是对事故负责的4946名汽车司机;对照是从无责任的汽车司机中挑选出的1986名汽车司机,挑选方式使对照组与一般驾驶人群相似。在对年龄、性别和酒精进行调整后,大麻对致命事故责任的影响显著:调整后的优势比为1.89[1.43 - 2.51]。剂量反应效应显著(p = 0.0001)。对于酒精(≥0.1 g/l),责任的调整后优势比为8.39[6.95 - 10.11]。未发现酒精和大麻之间存在相互作用。对于苯丙胺、可卡因和阿片类药物,调整后的优势比与1无显著差异。然而,统计功效较低。该研究发现酒精的优势比与之前发表的结果相似。对于大麻,显著的优势比以及显著的剂量反应效应表明大麻与道路交通事故之间存在因果关系。注意到大麻和酒精之间存在相乘效应。