• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在血液酒精含量低于法定限量的情况下驾驶时大麻与撞车责任

Cannabis and crash responsibility while driving below the alcohol per se legal limit.

作者信息

Romano Eduardo, Voas Robert B, Camp Bayliss

机构信息

PIRE, United States.

Research & Development California Department of Motor Vehicles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.003
PMID:28841409
Abstract

There is a growing interest in how extensively the use of marijuana by drivers relates to crash involvement. While cognitive, lab-based studies are consistent in showing that the use of cannabis impairs driving tasks, epidemiological, field-based studies have been inconclusive regarding whether cannabis use causes an increased risk of accidents. There is ample evidence that the presence of cannabis among drivers with a BAC≥0.08g/dL highly increases the likelihood of a motor vehicle crash. Less clear, however, is the contribution of cannabis to crash risk when drivers have consumed very little or no alcohol. This effort addresses this gap in knowledge. We took advantage of a unique database that merged fatal crashes in the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), which allows for a precise identification of crash responsibility. To account for recent increase in lab testing, we restricted our sample to cover only the years 1993-2009. A total of 4294 drivers were included in the analyses. Descriptive analyses and logistic regressions were run to model the contribution of alcohol and drugs to the likelihood of being responsible in a fatal crash. We found evidence that compared with drivers negative for alcohol and cannabis, the presence of cannabis elevates crash responsibility in fatal crashes among drivers at zero BACs (OR=1.89) and with 0<BAC<0.05g/dL (OR=3.42), suggesting that emphasis on curbing impaired driving should not be solely focused on heavy-drinking drivers. Data limitations however caution about the generalizability of study findings. Special efforts to understand the effect of cannabis on fatal crashes, in particular in the absence of alcohol, are needed.

摘要

司机使用大麻的广泛程度与撞车事故的关联正受到越来越多的关注。虽然基于实验室的认知研究一致表明,使用大麻会损害驾驶任务,但基于现场的流行病学研究对于大麻使用是否会增加事故风险尚无定论。有充分证据表明,血液酒精浓度(BAC)≥0.08g/dL的司机体内存在大麻会大幅增加机动车撞车的可能性。然而,当司机饮酒极少或未饮酒时,大麻对撞车风险的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在填补这一知识空白。我们利用了一个独特的数据库,该数据库整合了加利福尼亚州综合交通记录系统(SWITRS)和死亡分析报告系统(FARS)中的致命撞车事故数据,从而能够精确确定撞车责任。为了考虑近期实验室检测的增加,我们将样本限制在1993年至2009年。共有4294名司机纳入分析。进行了描述性分析和逻辑回归,以模拟酒精和药物对致命撞车事故中责任可能性的影响。我们发现,与酒精和大麻检测呈阴性的司机相比,大麻的存在会增加BAC为零的司机(OR = 1.89)以及0 < BAC < 0.05g/dL的司机在致命撞车事故中的责任(OR = 3.42),这表明对遏制酒驾的关注不应仅局限于重度饮酒的司机。然而,数据限制提醒我们要谨慎对待研究结果的普遍性。需要做出特别努力来了解大麻对致命撞车事故的影响,尤其是在没有酒精的情况下。

相似文献

1
Cannabis and crash responsibility while driving below the alcohol per se legal limit.在血液酒精含量低于法定限量的情况下驾驶时大麻与撞车责任
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
2
Effectiveness of lowering the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving from 0.10 to 0.08 grams per deciliter in the United States.在美国,将驾驶的血液酒精浓度(BAC)限制从每分升0.10克降至0.08克的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1508836. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
3
Cannabis use as a risk factor for causing motor vehicle crashes: a prospective study.大麻使用作为导致机动车事故的风险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1616-1626. doi: 10.1111/add.14663. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
International policies on alcohol impaired driving: are legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limits in motorized countries compatible with the scientific evidence?关于酒后驾驶的国际政策:机动车国家的法定血液酒精浓度(BAC)限制是否与科学证据相符?
Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi. 2003 Apr;38(2):83-102.
5
Alcohol-Related Risk of Driver Fatalities in Motor Vehicle Crashes: Comparing Data From 2007 and 2013-2014.酒精相关的机动车事故中驾驶员死亡风险:2007 年和 2013-2014 年数据比较。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Jul;79(4):547-552. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.547.
6
Examination of the role of the combination of alcohol and cannabis in South Australian road crashes.南澳大利亚道路交通事故中酒精与大麻共同作用的角色研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(5):443-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.969804.
7
Alcohol involvement and other risky driver behaviors: effects on crash initiation and crash severity.酒精摄入与其他危险驾驶行为:对事故初始发生与事故严重程度的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(4):325-34. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.822491.
8
Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data.与酒精相关的驾驶员死亡以及驾驶员卷入致命撞车事故的相对风险与驾驶员年龄和性别的关系:基于1996年数据的更新
J Stud Alcohol. 2000 May;61(3):387-95. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2000.61.387.
9
Understanding the context of alcohol impaired driving for fatal crash-involved drivers: A descriptive case analysis.了解涉及致命撞车事故的酒驾司机的背景情况:一项描述性案例分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Nov 17;18(8):781-787. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1322696. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Marijuana and the Risk of Fatal Car Crashes: What Can We Learn from FARS and NRS Data?大麻与致命车祸风险:我们能从美国国家公路交通安全管理局事故分析报告系统(FARS)和国家公路交通安全管理局国家统计报告系统(NRS)数据中学到什么?
J Prim Prev. 2017 Jun;38(3):315-328. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0478-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Event-level influences of alcohol, cannabis, and simultaneous use on perceived driving risk.酒精、大麻及同时使用对感知驾驶风险的事件层面影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Apr;33(2):170-177. doi: 10.1037/pha0000758. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Drug driving: a secondary analysis of factors associated with driving under the influence of cannabis in Jamaica.药物驾驶:对牙买加与大麻影响下驾驶相关因素的二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):e078437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078437.
3
The difference in quasi-induced exposure to crashes involving various hazardous driving actions.
涉及各种危险驾驶行为的事故准暴露差异。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0279387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279387. eCollection 2023.
4
Simultaneous Alcohol/Cannabis Use and Driving Under the Influence in the U.S.美国的同时饮酒/吸食大麻与酒后驾车行为
Am J Prev Med. 2022 May;62(5):661-669. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.009. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Aggressive Driving Behaviours in Cannabis Users. The Influence of Consumer Characteristics.吸食大麻者的侵略性驾驶行为。消费者特征的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3911. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083911.
6
Road traffic injuries and substance use among emergency department patients in the Dominican Republic and Peru.多米尼加共和国和秘鲁急诊科患者的道路交通伤害与物质使用情况。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Mar 24;45:e31. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.31. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploring Cannabis and Alcohol Co-Use in Adolescents: A Narrative Review of the Evidence.探索青少年中大麻和酒精的共同使用:证据的叙述性综述。
J Dual Diagn. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):58-74. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2019.1660020. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
8
Trajectories of Driving after Drinking among Marijuana-Using Youth in the Emergency Department: Substance Use, Mental Health, and Peer and Parental Influences.急诊科中使用大麻的青少年酒后驾车轨迹:物质使用、心理健康以及同伴和父母的影响。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(2):175-187. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1660675. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Drivers who tested positive for cannabis in oral fluid: a longitudinal analysis of administrative data for Spain between 2011 and 2016.口服液中检测出大麻阳性的驾驶员:2011 年至 2016 年西班牙行政数据的纵向分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e026648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026648.
10
What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? The association between initial blood alcohol concentration and polysubstance use may be indicative of a gateway drug effect.危重症与损伤科学有哪些新进展?初始血液酒精浓度与多物质使用之间的关联可能表明存在入门药物效应。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2018 Oct-Dec;8(4):181-183. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_80_18.