Suppr超能文献

参与肺癌筛查试验的态度:一项定性研究。

Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Yvonne Carter Building, London E1 2AB, UK.

出版信息

Thorax. 2012 May;67(5):418-25. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200055. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer is key to reducing mortality. New evidence suggests that smokers have negative attitudes to screening and participation in lung cancer screening trials is poor (<1 in 6 of those eligible). Understanding participation is important since uptake in screening trials is likely to predict uptake in screening programmes. A qualitative study of people accepting and declining participation in the Lung-SEARCH screening trial was conducted. Two questions were addressed: Are the screening methods offered acceptable to patients? Why do some people take part and others decline?

METHODS

The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 60 respondents from three groups: (a) trial participants providing an annual sputum sample; (b) trial participants with a sputum sample showing abnormal cytology and thus undergoing annual CT scanning and bronchoscopy; and (c) those declining trial participation.

RESULTS

Most respondents (48/60, 80%) viewed sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy as largely acceptable. Those declining trial participation described fear of bronchoscopy, inconvenience of travelling to hospitals for screening investigations and perceived themselves as having low susceptibility to lung cancer or being too old to benefit. Patients declining participation discounted their risk from smoking and considered negative family histories and good health to be protective. Four typological behaviours emerged within those declining: 'too old to be bothered', 'worriers', 'fatalists' and 'avoiders'.

CONCLUSION

Sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy are largely acceptable to those participating in a screening trial. However, the decision to participate or decline reflects a complex balance of factors including acceptability and convenience of screening methods, risk perception, altruism and self-interest. Improving practical and changing cognitive aspects of participation will be key to improving uptake of lung cancer screening.

摘要

背景

早期诊断肺癌是降低死亡率的关键。新证据表明,吸烟者对筛查持消极态度,参与肺癌筛查试验的人数很少(符合条件者中不到 1/6)。了解参与情况很重要,因为筛查试验的参与率可能预示着筛查计划的参与率。对接受和拒绝参与 Lung-SEARCH 筛查试验的人进行了定性研究。提出了两个问题:提供的筛查方法是否被患者接受?为什么有些人参与,而有些人拒绝?

方法

这项定性研究使用半结构化访谈,对来自三个组别的 60 名受访者进行了访谈:(a)每年提供痰样的试验参与者;(b)痰样显示异常细胞学因而每年接受 CT 扫描和支气管镜检查的试验参与者;以及(c)拒绝参与试验的人。

结果

大多数受访者(60 名中的 48 名,80%)认为提供痰样、CT 扫描和支气管镜检查基本可以接受。那些拒绝参与试验的人描述了对支气管镜检查的恐惧、因去医院接受筛查检查而带来的不便,以及认为自己患肺癌的可能性较低或年龄太大而无法受益。拒绝参与的患者低估了吸烟的风险,并认为负面的家族史和良好的健康状况具有保护作用。在拒绝参与的人中出现了四种典型行为:“太老了,不想麻烦”、“焦虑者”、“宿命论者”和“回避者”。

结论

参与筛查试验的人基本可以接受提供痰样、CT 扫描和支气管镜检查。然而,参与或拒绝的决定反映了一系列复杂的因素平衡,包括筛查方法的可接受性和便利性、风险感知、利他主义和自身利益。改善参与的实际情况和改变认知方面将是提高肺癌筛查参与率的关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验