Biological Chemistry & Bioactives, Food Innovation, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd , Ruakura Private Bag 3123, Waikato Mail Centre, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
J Proteome Res. 2012 Feb 3;11(2):1065-77. doi: 10.1021/pr200807p. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by intestinal inflammation and is believed to involve complex interactions between genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. We measured changes in the proteome associated with bacterially induced intestinal inflammation in the interleukin 10 gene-deficient (Il10(-/-)) mouse model of IBD, established effects of the dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) n-3 eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and n-6 arachidonic acid (AA) on protein expression (using oleic acid as a control fatty acid), and compared these changes with previously observed transcriptome changes in the same model. Ingenuity pathways analysis of proteomics data showed bacterially induced inflammation was associated with reduced expression of proteins from pathways of metabolism and digestion/absorption/excretion of nutrients/ions, and increased expression of cellular stress and immune response proteins. Both PUFA treatments showed anti-inflammatory activity; EPA appeared to act via the PPARα pathway, whereas AA appeared to increase energy metabolism and cytoskeletal organization and reduce cellular stress responses, possibly enabling a more robust response to inflammation. While there was agreement between proteomic and transcriptomic data with respect to pathways, there was limited concordance between individual gene and protein data, reflecting the importance of having both gene and protein data to better understand complex diseases such as IBD.
炎症性肠病(IBD)的特征是肠道炎症,据信涉及遗传、免疫和环境因素之间的复杂相互作用。我们测量了与细菌诱导的肠道炎症相关的蛋白质组变化在 IBD 的白细胞介素 10 基因缺陷(Il10(-/-))小鼠模型中,确定了膳食多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)n-3 二十碳五烯酸(EPA)和 n-6 花生四烯酸(AA)对蛋白质表达的影响(用油酸作为对照脂肪酸),并将这些变化与同一模型中先前观察到的转录组变化进行了比较。蛋白质组学数据分析表明,细菌诱导的炎症与代谢和消化/吸收/排泄途径的蛋白质表达减少以及细胞应激和免疫反应蛋白的表达增加有关。两种 PUFAs 处理均显示出抗炎活性;EPA 似乎通过 PPARα 途径发挥作用,而 AA 似乎增加了能量代谢和细胞骨架组织,减少了细胞应激反应,可能使对炎症的反应更加强烈。尽管在途径方面蛋白质组学和转录组学数据之间存在一致性,但个别基因和蛋白质数据之间的一致性有限,这反映了同时拥有基因和蛋白质数据对于更好地理解 IBD 等复杂疾病的重要性。