Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病患者血糖监测情况调查:医护人员的建议是否得到遵循?

A survey of blood glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes: are recommendations from health care professionals being followed?

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Nov;27 Suppl 3:31-7. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.599838.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To survey the self-reported use of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), both insulin users (IUs) and non-insulin users (NIUs), in the United States and to examine: how often patients test; what SMBG instructions patients report receiving from their health care providers (HCPs); how the frequency of testing conforms with reported HCP recommendations for testing; and what is done with the results of testing. Differences between IUs and NIUs were also investigated.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 886 T2DM participants at a series of one-day conferences across the United States completed a survey on current and recommended SMBG frequency, how SMBG results were used, and how HCPs reportedly talked about SMBG issues with the patient. IUs (65% of the sample) and NIUs (35%) were examined separately.

RESULTS

IUs and NIUs reported testing significantly less frequently than was recommended (in both cases, p < 0.001), with wide variations within both groups. Many IUs (42%) and NIUs (50%) did not bring SMBG data regularly to medical visits, and 54% of IUs and 56% of NIUs did not respond regularly to out-of-range SMBG readings. HCPs were generally supportive and responsive to SMBG data. More frequent SMBG was associated with more regular HCP attention to SMBG records, for IUs (p = 0.02) and NIUs (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported SMBG use is common in T2DM, though frequency is lower than HCP recommendations. Wide variations in actual and recommended SMBG were observed. HCP support for SMBG is reportedly common, and is associated with greater SMBG frequency. While SMBG data can be valuable, recommendations are often not followed and data often goes unused by both HCPs and patients.

摘要

目的

调查美国 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者(包括胰岛素使用者[IUs]和非胰岛素使用者[NIUs])自我报告的自我血糖监测(SMBG)使用情况,并研究:患者多久检测一次;患者报告从其医疗保健提供者(HCPs)收到的 SMBG 指导;检测频率如何符合 HCP 推荐的检测频率;以及如何处理检测结果。还调查了 IUs 和 NIUs 之间的差异。

方法

在美国一系列为期一天的会议上,对 886 名 T2DM 参与者进行了一项关于当前和推荐的 SMBG 频率、SMBG 结果的使用方式以及 HCP 据称如何与患者讨论 SMBG 问题的调查。分别检查了 IUs(样本的 65%)和 NIUs(样本的 35%)。

结果

IUs 和 NIUs 报告的检测频率明显低于推荐频率(两种情况均 p < 0.001),两组内均存在很大差异。许多 IUs(42%)和 NIUs(50%)没有定期将 SMBG 数据带到医疗就诊中,54%的 IUs 和 56%的 NIUs 没有对超出范围的 SMBG 读数做出定期响应。HCP 通常对 SMBG 数据表示支持并做出回应。对于 IUs(p = 0.02)和 NIUs(p = 0.004),更频繁的 SMBG 与 HCP 更频繁地关注 SMBG 记录相关。

结论

T2DM 患者自我报告的 SMBG 使用较为常见,尽管频率低于 HCP 推荐的频率。观察到实际和推荐的 SMBG 之间存在很大差异。据报道,HCP 对 SMBG 的支持很普遍,并且与更高的 SMBG 频率相关。虽然 SMBG 数据可能很有价值,但建议往往未得到遵循,并且 HCP 和患者都经常未使用数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验