University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Dec;41(12):1690-710. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03892.x.
In 2010 over 200 articles were published in Clinical and Experimental Allergy including editorials, reviews, opinion articles, letters, book reviews and of course at the heart of the journal, papers containing original data which have moved the field of allergy forward on a number of fronts. For the third year running the editors felt it would be of value to summarize the key messages contained in these papers as a snapshot of where the cutting edge of research into allergic disease is leading. We have broadly followed the sections of the journal, although this year the mechanistic articles are grouped together and the studies involving experimental models of disease are discussed throughout the paper. In the field of asthma and rhinitis phenotypes and biomarkers continue to a major pre-occupation of our authors. There is continued interest in mechanisms of inflammation and disordered lung function with the mouse model of asthma continuing to offer new insights. There is also a steady flow of papers investigating new therapies, including those derived from plants and herbs, although many are mechanistic with too few high quality clinical trials. The mechanisms involved in allergic disease are well covered with many strong papers using clinical material to ask relevant questions. Pro-pre and snybiotics continue to be of major interest to our authors and this remains a controversial and complicated field. The discipline of epidemiology has retained its interest in risk factors for the development of allergic disease with a view to refining and debating the reasons for the allergy epidemic. There is continued interest in the relationship between helminthic disease and allergy with a new twist in 2010 involving studies using infection with helminths as a potential treatment. The genetics of allergic disease continues to be very productive, although the field has moved on from only investigating single nucleotide polymorphisms of candidate genes to Genome Wide Association Studies and an increasing and welcome emphasis on gene-environment interactions. In the field of clinical allergy there is steady flow of papers describing patterns of drug allergy with renewed interest in reactions to contrast media, but food allergy is the major area of interest in this section of the journal. Lastly in the field of allergens there is a growing interest in the role of component resolved diagnosis in improving the diagnosis and management of allergic disease. Another excellent year, full of fascinating and high quality work, which the journal has been proud to bring to the allergy community.
2010 年,《临床与实验过敏》发表了 200 多篇文章,包括社论、评论、观点文章、信件、书评,当然还有期刊的核心内容,即包含推动过敏领域多个方面前进的原始数据的论文。编辑连续第三年认为,总结这些论文中的关键信息,作为过敏疾病研究前沿的一个快照是很有价值的。我们大致遵循期刊的各个部分,尽管今年将机制文章分组在一起,并且将涉及疾病实验模型的研究贯穿整篇论文进行讨论。在哮喘和鼻炎表型和生物标志物领域,我们的作者仍然非常关注。炎症和肺功能障碍机制的研究仍然很感兴趣,哮喘的小鼠模型继续提供新的见解。也有大量研究新疗法的论文,包括来自植物和草药的疗法,尽管其中许多是机制性的,高质量的临床试验太少。过敏疾病相关的机制也有很多强有力的论文进行了很好的探讨,这些论文使用临床材料提出了相关问题。益生菌和预生物仍然是我们作者关注的主要领域,这仍然是一个有争议和复杂的领域。流行病学领域仍然对过敏性疾病发展的危险因素感兴趣,目的是完善和辩论过敏流行的原因。蠕虫病与过敏之间的关系仍然很感兴趣,2010 年出现了一个新的转折,涉及使用寄生虫感染作为潜在治疗方法的研究。过敏疾病的遗传学仍然非常有成效,尽管该领域已经从仅研究候选基因的单核苷酸多态性发展到全基因组关联研究,并且越来越欢迎强调基因-环境相互作用。在临床过敏领域,描述药物过敏模式的论文源源不断,人们对造影剂反应重新产生兴趣,但食物过敏是该期刊这一部分的主要关注领域。最后,在过敏原领域,人们对成分解析诊断在改善过敏疾病的诊断和管理中的作用越来越感兴趣。又一个精彩的年份,充满了引人入胜和高质量的工作,期刊为此感到自豪,并将其呈现给过敏界。