Brooks Steven C, Toma Alina, Hsu Jonathan
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;30(1):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
Even the best conventional manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is highly inefficient, producing only a fraction of normal cardiac output. Over the past several decades, many therapeutic devices have been designed to improve on conventional CPR during cardiac arrest and increase the probability of survival. This article reviews several adjuncts and mechanical alternatives to conventional CPR for use during cardiac arrest. Recent clinical studies comparing conventional resuscitation techniques with the use of devices during cardiac arrest are reviewed, with a focus on clinical implications and directions for future research.
即使是最好的传统手动心肺复苏术（CPR）效率也非常低，只能产生正常心输出量的一小部分。在过去几十年里，人们设计了许多治疗设备，以在心脏骤停期间改进传统心肺复苏术，并提高生存几率。本文综述了心脏骤停期间用于替代传统心肺复苏术的几种辅助手段和机械替代方法。本文回顾了最近将传统复苏技术与心脏骤停期间使用设备进行比较的临床研究，重点关注临床意义和未来研究方向。
