School of Population Health, Cancer Prevention Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.
Ann Behav Med. 2012 Apr;43(2):229-38. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9324-7.
Physical activity is important following breast cancer. Trials of non-face-to-face interventions are needed to assist in reaching women living outside major metropolitan areas.
This study seeks to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a telephone-delivered, mixed aerobic and resistance exercise intervention for non-urban Australian women with breast cancer.
A randomized controlled trial comparing an 8-month intervention delivered by exercise physiologists (n = 73) to usual care (n = 70).
Sixty-one percent recruitment rate and 96% retention at 12 months; 79% of women in the intervention group received at least 75% of calls; odds (OR, 95% CI) of meeting intervention targets favored the intervention group for resistance training (OR 3.2; 1.2, 8.9) and aerobic (OR 2.1; 0.8, 5.5) activity.
Given the limited availability of physical activity programs for non-urban women with breast cancer, results provide strong support for feasibility and modest support for the efficacy of telephone-delivered interventions.
乳腺癌患者需要进行身体活动。需要开展非面对面干预试验,以帮助居住在大都市以外地区的女性。
本研究旨在评估电话传递的混合有氧和抗阻运动干预措施对澳大利亚非城市乳腺癌女性的可行性和效果。
一项比较由运动生理学家提供的 8 个月干预(n=73)与常规护理(n=70)的随机对照试验。
61%的招募率和 12 个月时 96%的保留率;干预组中 79%的女性接受了至少 75%的电话;干预组满足抗阻训练(OR 3.2;1.2,8.9)和有氧运动(OR 2.1;0.8,5.5)活动目标的可能性大于常规护理组。
鉴于针对乳腺癌非城市女性的身体活动计划有限,结果强烈支持该电话干预措施的可行性,并适度支持其效果。