Hogewoning C R C, Ruhe I M C, Bekker M D, Hogewoning C J A, Putter H, DeRuiter M C, Pelger R C M, Elzevier H W
Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 May;23(5):589-95. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1605-y. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
The objective of this study was the assessment of the efficiency of the MiniArc for curing stress urinary incontinence.
Seventy-seven patients, operated on from March 2008 to November 2009, were evaluated in this study. One-year post-operative data are presented. All patients suffered from predominant stress urinary incontinence. After 1 year, response was 74%. Evaluation was performed using a questionnaire consisting of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, the Urinary Distress Inventory, the Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, short form, and the Defecation Distress Inventory.
One year after surgery, 68% of the patients stated an improvement in their incontinence status, while only 44% stated to be completely dry.
The 1-year follow-up suggests that the MiniArc is less effective in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence than the TVT.
本研究的目的是评估MiniArc治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效。
本研究对2008年3月至2009年11月期间接受手术的77例患者进行了评估。呈现了术后1年的数据。所有患者均以压力性尿失禁为主。1年后，有效率为74%。使用包含欧洲五维健康量表、患者总体改善印象、尿失禁影响问卷、排尿困扰量表、盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷简表和排便困扰量表的问卷进行评估。
术后1年，68%的患者表示其尿失禁状况有所改善，而只有44%的患者表示完全干爽。
1年随访表明，MiniArc治疗压力性尿失禁的效果不如经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术（TVT）。
