University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, USA.
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Mar;29(3):226-33. doi: 10.1002/da.20908. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
Given the general population prevalence rates of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and the affective disorders, one would expect the co-occurrence of these syndromes to be rare. Yet findings by our group and others have revealed extremely high rates of comorbidity in OCD with both depressive disorders (DD; 50%) and bipolar disorder (BPD; 10%). The current investigation sought to further clarify the role affective disorder comorbidity-particularly that with BPD-may play in the clinical expression of OCD.
A total of 605 individuals with OCD were evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. The sample included three groups: BPD (bipolar I or II; N = 79, 13.1%), DD (major depression or dysthymia; N = 388, 64.1%), and NAD (no affective disorder comorbidity; N = 138, 22.8%). Group-wise comparisons were conducted on comorbidity patterns, impairment measures, and clinical features of OCD.
Analyses revealed a graded severity pattern, with the BPD group as the most severe, followed by the DD group, and finally the NAD group. Severity was reflected by the total number of Axis I disorders (P<.01), the number of psychiatric hospitalizations (P<.001), impairment measures (Ps<.05), and OCD symptoms (P<.01). It is worth noting that the impairment and OCD symptom severity findings were not attributable to the higher level of nonmood disorder comorbidities in the BPD and DD groups.
Those individuals with comorbid affective disorders, particularly BPD, represent a clinically severe group compared to those without such comorbidity. Clarifying the phenomenological features of OCD-affective disorder comorbidity has important etiological and treatment implications.
鉴于强迫症(OCD)和情感障碍在普通人群中的患病率,人们预计这些综合征同时发生的情况会很少见。然而,我们小组和其他小组的研究结果表明,OCD 与抑郁症(DD;50%)和双相情感障碍(BPD;10%)的共病率极高。目前的研究旨在进一步阐明情感障碍共病——特别是与 BPD 的共病——在 OCD 临床表现中的作用。
共有 605 名 OCD 患者接受了 DSM-IV 结构化临床访谈。该样本包括三组:BPD(双相 I 或 II;N=79,13.1%)、DD(重性抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍;N=388,64.1%)和 NAD(无情感障碍共病;N=138,22.8%)。对各组之间的共病模式、损害指标和 OCD 的临床特征进行了比较。
分析结果显示出一种严重程度的分级模式,其中 BPD 组最为严重,其次是 DD 组,最后是 NAD 组。严重程度反映在以下方面:轴 I 障碍的总数(P<.01)、精神病院住院次数(P<.001)、损害指标(Ps<.05)和 OCD 症状(P<.01)。值得注意的是,损害和 OCD 症状严重程度的发现并不是由于 BPD 和 DD 组中非心境障碍共病的水平较高所致。
与没有此类共病的患者相比,患有共病情感障碍的个体,尤其是 BPD,代表了一个临床严重的群体。阐明 OCD-情感障碍共病的现象学特征具有重要的病因学和治疗意义。