Suppr超能文献

马来西亚血清特异性IgE与皮肤点刺试验在过敏诊断中的比较。

Comparison of serum specific IgE with skin prick test in the diagnosis of allergy in Malaysia.

作者信息

Asha'ari Z A, Suhaimi Y, Yusof R A, Rushdan I, Maraina C H C

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Hospital, 25100 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2011 Aug;66(3):202-6.

Abstract

We compared a newer serum specific IgE (SSIgE) test with skin prick testing (SPT) in the diagnosis of allergy in Malaysia. Ninety newly diagnosed allergic patients were enrolled for both tests. Using SPT as a clinical gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for SSIgE for each of the common allergens tested. The highest positive results for both SPT and SSIgE were for house dust mite and cat. Compared to SPT, SSIgE showed better sensitivity but poorer specificity, low PPV and good NPV in all the allergens tested. Significant positive correlation was seen between the diameter of wheal and flare of SPT and the SSIgE results.

摘要

我们在马来西亚对一种新型血清特异性IgE(SSIgE)检测与皮肤点刺试验(SPT)在过敏诊断中的应用进行了比较。90名新诊断的过敏患者接受了这两种检测。以SPT作为临床金标准,计算了针对每种检测的常见过敏原的SSIgE的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV、NPV)。SPT和SSIgE的最高阳性结果均为屋尘螨和猫。与SPT相比,SSIgE在所有检测的过敏原中显示出更好的敏感性,但特异性较差、PPV较低且NPV良好。SPT的风团和红晕直径与SSIgE结果之间存在显著正相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验