Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Apr;125(4):872-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.043. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
Shrimp is a frequent cause of food allergy. Tropomyosin is the major allergen in shrimp, and it shares homology to tropomyosins from other crustaceans, dust mites, cockroach, and parasites.
The aim of this study was to determine the value of detection of IgE to shrimp tropomyosin in the diagnosis of shrimp allergy.
We have studied 35 patients with asthma, rhinitis, or both who were sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. All subjects underwent skin prick testing in addition to double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC); oral open challenges; or both with shrimp. Measurements of IgE to shrimp and shrimp tropomyosin were carried out by means of CAP and chimeric ELISA, respectively.
Oral challenges confirmed the diagnosis of shrimp allergy in 7 patients. IgE measurement to shrimp tropomyosin was positive in 71.4% of the patients with shrimp allergy. Of the 28 patients without shrimp allergy, only 7.1% (2/28) had IgE to shrimp tropomyosin compared with 25% (7/28) who had IgE to shrimp and 35.7% (10/28) who had positive skin prick test responses to shrimp. Sensitivity was similar for all 3 methods (71.4%); in contrast, specificity of IgE to shrimp tropomyosin (92.8%) was greater than that of IgE to shrimp (75%) and skin prick testing (64.2%). With regard to diagnostic efficiency, measurement of IgE to shrimp tropomyosin was superior to measurement of IgE to shrimp and skin prick testing (88.5%, 74.2%, and 65.7%, respectively).
Use of measurements of IgE to shrimp tropomyosin provided added value to the diagnosis of shrimp allergy.
虾是食物过敏的常见原因。肌球蛋白是虾中的主要过敏原,它与其他甲壳类动物、尘螨、蟑螂和寄生虫的肌球蛋白同源。
本研究旨在确定检测虾肌球蛋白 IgE 在虾过敏诊断中的价值。
我们研究了 35 名对屋尘螨过敏的哮喘、鼻炎或两者均有的患者。所有患者均进行了皮肤点刺试验,此外还进行了双盲、安慰剂对照食物挑战(DBPCFC);口服开放挑战;或两者均用虾进行。通过 CAP 和嵌合 ELISA 分别检测虾和虾肌球蛋白的 IgE。
口服挑战证实了 7 名患者的虾过敏诊断。虾过敏患者中,71.4%的患者虾肌球蛋白 IgE 检测结果为阳性。在 28 名无虾过敏的患者中,只有 7.1%(2/28)的患者对虾肌球蛋白 IgE 呈阳性,而 25%(7/28)的患者对虾 IgE 呈阳性,35.7%(10/28)的患者对虾皮肤点刺试验呈阳性。所有 3 种方法的敏感性相似(71.4%);相比之下,虾肌球蛋白 IgE(92.8%)的特异性大于虾 IgE(75%)和皮肤点刺试验(64.2%)。就诊断效率而言,虾肌球蛋白 IgE 检测优于虾 IgE 检测和皮肤点刺试验(分别为 88.5%、74.2%和 65.7%)。
检测虾肌球蛋白 IgE 可提高虾过敏的诊断价值。