School of Medicine and Health, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2012 Mar;63 Suppl 1:37-42. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2011.636344. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
Demonstrating single and multiple functions attributable to foods or specific food components is a challenge. The International Life Sciences Institute Europe co-ordinated EU concerted actions, Functional Food Science in Europe (FUFOSE) and the Process for the Assessment of Scientific Support for Claims on Food (PASSCLAIM), respectively, addressed the soundness of the evidence and its coherence with a mechanistic schema comprising valid markers of exposure, intermediate and final outcomes and the quality and integrity of the evidence overall. Demonstrating causality often relies on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, in public health and biomedical science there is concern about the suitability of RCTs as sole standards of evidence-based approaches. Alternative and complementary approaches using updated Hill's viewpoints for appraising the evidence can be used in conjunction with evidence-based mechanistic reasoning and the quality criteria proposed in FUFOSE and PASSCLAIM to design studies and to assemble evidence exploring single or multiple benefits from food components and foods.
证明食物或特定食物成分具有单一或多种功能是一项挑战。国际生命科学学会欧洲分部分别协调了欧盟联合行动、欧洲功能性食品科学(FUFOSE)和食品声称科学支持评估过程(PASSCLAIM),以解决证据的可靠性及其与包含有效暴露标志物、中间和最终结果以及整体证据质量和完整性的机制方案的一致性问题。证明因果关系通常依赖于随机对照试验(RCT)。然而,在公共卫生和生物医学科学领域,人们担心 RCT 作为循证方法的唯一标准是否合适。可以使用更新后的希尔观点来评估证据的替代和补充方法,与基于循证的机制推理以及 FUFOSE 和 PASSCLAIM 中提出的质量标准相结合,用于设计研究和收集证据,以探索食物成分和食物的单一或多种益处。