Suppr超能文献

Circuit 类训练或 7 天治疗方案对脑卒中后康复强度的影响:CIRCIT 试验方案。

Circuit class or seven-day therapy for increasing intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: protocol of the CIRCIT trial.

机构信息

International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2011 Dec;6(6):560-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00686.x.

Abstract

RATIONALE

There is strong evidence for a dose-response relationship between physical therapy early after stroke and recovery of function. The optimal method of maximizing physical therapy within finite health care resources is unknown.

AIMS

To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two alternative models of physical therapy service delivery (seven-days per week therapy services or group circuit class therapy over five-days a week) to usual care for people receiving inpatient rehabilitation after stroke.

DESIGN

Multicenter, three-armed randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcomes.

STUDY

A total of 282 people admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities after stroke with an admission functional independence measure (FIM) score within the moderate range (total 40-80 points or motor 38-62 points) will be randomized to receive one of three interventions: • usual care therapy over five-days a week • standard care therapy over seven-days a week, or • group circuit class therapy over five-days a week. Participants will receive the allocated intervention for the length of their hospital stay. Analysis will be by intention-to-treat.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome measure is walking ability (six-minute walk test) at four-week postintervention with three- and six-month follow-up. Economic analysis will include a costing analysis based on length of hospital stay and staffing/resource costs and a cost-utility analysis (incremental quality of life per incremental cost, relative to usual care). Secondary outcomes include walking speed and independence, ability to perform activities of daily living, arm function, quality of life and participant satisfaction.

摘要

背景

有强有力的证据表明,脑卒中后早期进行物理治疗与功能恢复之间存在剂量反应关系。最大限度地利用有限的医疗保健资源进行物理治疗的最佳方法尚不清楚。

目的

确定两种不同的物理治疗服务提供模式(每周 7 天治疗服务或每周 5 天的团体循环班治疗)与常规护理相比,对脑卒中后接受住院康复治疗的患者的有效性和成本效益。

设计

多中心、三臂随机对照试验,结局评估采用盲法。

研究

共有 282 名脑卒中后入住康复设施的患者,入院功能独立性测量(FIM)评分处于中度范围(总分 40-80 分或运动 38-62 分),将随机分为三组接受以下三种干预措施之一:①每周 5 天的常规护理治疗;②每周 7 天的标准护理治疗;③每周 5 天的团体循环班治疗。参与者将按照分配的干预方案接受治疗,直至出院。分析将采用意向治疗。

结局

主要结局测量指标是干预后 4 周的步行能力(6 分钟步行测试),并在 3 个月和 6 个月时进行随访。经济分析将包括基于住院时间和人员/资源成本的成本分析,以及成本效益分析(相对于常规护理,每增加一个单位的生活质量的增量成本)。次要结局包括步行速度和独立性、日常生活活动能力、上肢功能、生活质量和参与者满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验