Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for perforated necrotising enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM

Perforated necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) in preterm infants are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The optimum surgical management during the acute stage remains unclear. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of preterm infants (gestational age at birth <30 weeks) with perforated NEC or SIP undergoing primary peritoneal drainage (PD) versus laparotomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study (January 2004 to February 2010). Initial search of hospital database followed by a review of the medical records was performed to identify eligible infants. Thirty-nine infants were included in the study. Information regarding the baseline characteristics and outcomes of interest were recorded using the medical charts, radiology and laboratory databases. NEC was differentiated from SIP based on radiological, operative and clinical findings retrospectively for this study.

RESULTS

Among 39 infants, 19 underwent primary PD while 20 had primary laparotomy. Gestational age and birthweight were similar between the two groups. The composite outcome of mortality before discharge or hospital stay longer than 3 months post-term was significantly worse in PD group (74% vs. 40%, P= 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm infants undergoing PD for NEC/SIP appeared to have increased risk of adverse outcome compared with laparotomy. More randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.