Suppr超能文献

对随意运动和震颤假说的检验:多发性硬化症与姿势控制

A test of the rambling and trembling hypothesis: multiple sclerosis and postural control.

作者信息

Shin Sunghoon, Motl Robert W, Sosnoff Jacob J

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

出版信息

Motor Control. 2011 Oct;15(4):568-79. doi: 10.1123/mcj.15.4.568.

Abstract

The rambling-trembling analysis of postural control maintains that the center of pressure (COP) trajectory can be decomposed into deviations resulting from supraspinal (i.e., rambling; RM) and spinal processes (i.e., trembling; TM). The purpose of this investigation was to test the rambling and trembling hypothesis by comparing persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) who had either elevated or normal spinal reflexes to healthy controls. 16 subjects with MS and 16 age and gender matched control subjects completed a postural control task. The persons with MS were divided into groups with high (MShigh) or low (MSlow) H-reflex amplitude. The MShigh group had an elevated ratio of TM to COP compared with healthy controls, but no differences in the ratio between RM and COP. The findings are congruent with the assumptions of the rambling-trembling hypothesis. Further work is needed to determine if RM and TM represent distinct spinal and supraspinal mechanisms to postural control.

摘要

姿势控制的漫步 - 颤抖分析认为,压力中心(COP)轨迹可分解为由脊髓上(即漫步;RM)和脊髓过程(即颤抖;TM)产生的偏差。本研究的目的是通过比较脊髓反射升高或正常的多发性硬化症(MS)患者与健康对照来检验漫步和颤抖假说。16名MS患者和16名年龄及性别匹配的对照受试者完成了一项姿势控制任务。MS患者被分为高(MShigh)或低(MSlow)H反射幅度组。与健康对照相比,MShigh组的TM与COP比值升高,但RM与COP之间的比值无差异。这些发现与漫步 - 颤抖假说的假设一致。需要进一步的研究来确定RM和TM是否代表姿势控制中不同的脊髓和脊髓上机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验