Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤与坐姿姿势控制:对漫步和颤抖假说的一项测试。

Spinal Cord Injury and Seated Postural Control: A Test of the Rambling and Trembling Hypothesis.

作者信息

Shin Sunghoon, Sosnoff Jacob J

机构信息

1 Yeungnam University.

2 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

Motor Control. 2017 Oct 1;21(4):443-456. doi: 10.1123/mc.2016-0014. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

Abstract

Rambling-trembling analysis separates the center of pressure into two components: the rambling component (RM: supraspinal) and trembling component (TM: muscle stiffness/reflex). We hypothesized that persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) would demonstrate decreased RM resulting from altered supraspinal processing and increased TM resulting from increased muscle stiffness. We also anticipated that the TM component would be greater in SCI patients with Harrington rods than in those without them. The seated postural control was assessed in 18 persons with SCI, comprising 12 with and six without Harrington rods, and 18 age-matched controls. The SCI group had greater center of pressure sway, RM, and TM components than the controls, with no difference in the postural sway between the SCI subgroups, suggesting that the impairment of seated postural control in individuals with SCI results from disturbed supraspinal and peripheral mechanisms, but that the control itself is unaffected by internal fixation with Harrington rods. These were not entirely consistent with our hypothesis.

摘要

漫步-颤抖分析将压力中心分为两个部分:漫步部分(RM:脊髓上的)和颤抖部分(TM:肌肉僵硬/反射)。我们假设脊髓损伤(SCI)患者会因脊髓上处理改变而表现出RM降低,因肌肉僵硬增加而表现出TM增加。我们还预期,有哈灵顿棒的SCI患者的TM成分会比没有哈灵顿棒的患者更大。对18名SCI患者进行了坐姿姿势控制评估,其中12名有哈灵顿棒,6名没有哈灵顿棒,另有18名年龄匹配的对照组。SCI组的压力中心摆动、RM和TM成分均大于对照组,SCI亚组之间的姿势摆动无差异,这表明SCI个体的坐姿姿势控制受损是由脊髓上和外周机制紊乱引起的,但控制本身不受哈灵顿棒内固定的影响。这些结果与我们的假设并不完全一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验