The Day Treatment Rehabilitation Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(2):151-9. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.625351. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
Neuropsychological tests are often used to evaluate executive function (EF) deficits in patients suffering traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). This study compared the sensitivity of three such tests--namely, the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Sorting Test (D-KEFS ST), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and the Trail Making Test (TMT)--in differentiating between severe TBI patients and healthy controls. The differences between the two groups were significant for 5/5 variables evaluated through the D-KEFS ST, for 4/6 variables evaluated through the WCST, and for 2/2 variables evaluated through the TMT. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the variables "attempted sorts" in the D-KEFS ST and completion time in Part B of the TMT were the most powerful predictors of group assignment, with cutoff points of 9.5 sorts and 84.5 seconds, respectively. Our results highlight the possible value of the D-KEFS ST in the evaluation of postinjury EF deficits in TBI patients.
神经心理学测试常用于评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的执行功能(EF)缺陷。本研究比较了三种此类测试——即德利斯-卡普兰执行功能系统分类测试(D-KEFS ST)、威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)和连线测试(TMT)——在区分重度 TBI 患者和健康对照组方面的敏感性。对于通过 D-KEFS ST 评估的 5/5 个变量,对于通过 WCST 评估的 4/6 个变量,以及对于通过 TMT 评估的 2/2 个变量,两组之间的差异均具有统计学意义。受试者工作特征分析显示,D-KEFS ST 中的“尝试分类”和 TMT B 部分的完成时间是预测分组的最有力变量,截断值分别为 9.5 次和 84.5 秒。我们的结果强调了 D-KEFS ST 在评估 TBI 患者损伤后 EF 缺陷方面的可能价值。