Gómez-de-Regil Lizzette
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán Calle 7, No. 433 por 20 y 22, Fraccionamiento Altabrisa Mérida, Yucatán 97130, Mexico.
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):699. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100699.
This review aimed at providing a brief and comprehensive summary of recent research regarding the use of the Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST) to assess executive function in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A bibliographical search, performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo, targeted publications from 2010 to 2020, in English or Spanish. Information regarding the studies' designs, sample features and use of the WCST scores was recorded. An initial search eliciting 387 citations was reduced to 47 relevant papers. The highest proportion of publications came from the United States of America (34.0%) and included adult patients (95.7%). Observational designs were the most frequent (85.1%), the highest proportion being cross-sectional or case series studies. The average time after the occurrence of the TBI ranged from 4 to 62 years in single case studies, and from 6 weeks up to 23.5 years in the studies with more than one patient. Four studies compared groups of patients with TBI according to the severity (mild, moderate and/or severe), and in two cases, the studies compared TBI patients with healthy controls. Randomized control trials were seven in total. The noncomputerized WCST version including 128 cards was the most frequently used (78.7%). Characterization of the clinical profile of participants was the most frequent purpose (34.0%). The WCST is a common measure of executive function in patients with TBI. Although shorter and/or computerized versions are available, the original WCST with 128 cards is still used most often. The WCST is a useful tool for research and clinical purposes, yet a common practice is to report only one or a few of the possible scores, which prevents further valid comparisons across studies. Results might be useful to professionals in the clinical and research fields to guide them in assessment planning and proper interpretation of the WCST scores.
本综述旨在简要全面地总结近期有关使用威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者执行功能的研究。在PubMed、科学网、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和PsycInfo中进行了文献检索,目标是2010年至2020年期间以英文或西班牙文发表的文献。记录了有关研究设计、样本特征以及WCST分数使用情况的信息。初步检索得到387条引文,最终筛选出47篇相关论文。出版物比例最高的来自美国(34.0%),且研究对象多为成年患者(95.7%)。观察性设计最为常见(85.1%),其中横断面研究或病例系列研究占比最高。在单病例研究中,TBI发生后的平均时间为4至62年,而在多病例研究中,该时间范围为6周至23.5年。四项研究根据严重程度(轻度、中度和/或重度)对TBI患者组进行了比较,两项研究将TBI患者与健康对照进行了比较。随机对照试验共有七项。最常使用的是包含128张卡片的非计算机化WCST版本(78.7%)。对参与者临床特征的描述是最常见的目的(34.0%)。WCST是TBI患者执行功能的常用测量方法。尽管有更简短和/或计算机化的版本,但仍最常使用原始的128张卡片的WCST。WCST是用于研究和临床目的的有用工具,但常见的做法是只报告一个或几个可能的分数,这妨碍了跨研究进行进一步有效的比较。研究结果可能对临床和研究领域的专业人员有用,以指导他们进行评估规划和对WCST分数的正确解读。