• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复复杂度量表-扩展版:发现高复杂度需求的患者。

The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale--extended version: detection of patients with highly complex needs.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London School of Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(9):715-20. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.615880. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

DOI:10.3109/09638288.2011.615880
PMID:22115200
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the extended Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (RCS-E) and its factor structure, and to determine whether it provides added value over the RCS-version 2 to identify patients with highly complex rehabilitation needs.

METHOD

A cohort analysis of prospectively-collected routine clinical data from 331 patients with complex neurological disabilities undergoing inpatient rehabilitation in a tertiary specialist neurorehabilitation unit in the UK. RCS-E and RCS-v2 scores were recorded in parallel by the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) at fortnightly intervals, alongside the Northwick Park nursing (NPDS) and therapy (NPTDA) dependency scales, capturing nursing care and therapy interventions in staff hours/week.

RESULTS

Very strong correlations were found between total RCS-v2 and RCS-E scores (ρ = 0.954); the RCS-E "Care & nursing" subscale and care/nursing hours/week (ρ = 0.838, p < 0.001); and the RCS-E "Therapy" subscale and total therapy hours/week (p = 0.697, p < 0.001). The RCS-E showed better discrimination for complex therapy needs than the RCS-v2, but not for complex care/nursing needs. The RCS-E factor structure was similar to the RCS-v2, with moderate internal consistency overall, separating into two distinct dimensions ("Nursing/medical care + Equipment" and "Therapy").

CONCLUSION

The RCS-E provides an equivalent measure of complexity to the RCS-v2, but offers added value in identifying patients with highly complex therapy and equipment needs.

摘要

目的

描述扩展康复复杂度量表(RCS-E)及其因子结构,并确定其是否比 RCS-版本 2 更具价值,以识别具有高度复杂康复需求的患者。

方法

对英国一家三级专科神经康复单位的 331 名患有复杂神经残疾的住院康复患者的前瞻性收集的常规临床数据进行队列分析。多学科团队(MDT)在两周的间隔内同时记录 RCS-E 和 RCS-v2 评分,以及北威克公园护理(NPDS)和治疗(NPTDA)依赖量表,以记录每周工作人员护理和治疗干预的护理小时数/周。

结果

RCS-v2 和 RCS-E 总分之间存在非常强的相关性(ρ=0.954);RCS-E“护理”子量表和护理/小时/周(ρ=0.838,p<0.001);以及 RCS-E“治疗”子量表和每周总治疗时间(p=0.697,p<0.001)。RCS-E 对复杂治疗需求的区分能力优于 RCS-v2,但对复杂护理/小时/周的区分能力不如 RCS-v2。RCS-E 的因子结构与 RCS-v2 相似,整体内部一致性中等,分为两个不同维度(“护理/医疗护理+设备”和“治疗”)。

结论

RCS-E 提供了与 RCS-v2 等效的复杂性衡量标准,但在识别具有高度复杂治疗和设备需求的患者方面具有额外的价值。

相似文献

1
The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale--extended version: detection of patients with highly complex needs.康复复杂度量表-扩展版:发现高复杂度需求的患者。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(9):715-20. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.615880. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
2
The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale version 2: a clinimetric evaluation in patients with severe complex neurodisability.康复复杂性量表第二版:严重复杂神经残疾患者的临床评估。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;81(2):146-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.173716. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
3
The Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment scale: a psychometric analysis from a large multicentre neurorehabilitation dataset.诺斯威克公园治疗依赖评估量表:来自大型多中心神经康复数据集的心理测量分析
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(21):1976-83. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.998779. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Northwick Park Dependency Scale.北威克依赖量表的心理计量学评估。
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Nov;42(10):936-43. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0602.
5
Development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment.诺斯威克公园治疗依赖评估的开发与初步验证
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Oct;23(10):922-37. doi: 10.1177/0269215509337447.
6
Predicting length of stay in specialist neurological rehabilitation.预测在专科神经康复中的住院时间。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Mar;40(5):548-552. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1261419. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
7
Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set.针对患有复杂神经功能障碍的工作年龄成年人的专科住院康复的成本效益:一项基于国家临床数据集的多中心队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 24;6(2):e010238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010238.
8
Measuring complexity in neurological rehabilitation: the Oxford Case Complexity Assessment Measure (OCCAM).测量神经康复中的复杂性:牛津病例复杂性评估量表(OCCAM)。
Clin Rehabil. 2014 May;28(5):499-507. doi: 10.1177/0269215513505300. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Rehabilitation Complexity Scale: Italian translation and transcultural validation.康复复杂性量表:意大利语翻译及跨文化验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(1):87-96. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1024340. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Cost-efficiency of specialist hyperacute in-patient rehabilitation services for medically unstable patients with complex rehabilitation needs: a prospective cohort analysis.具有复杂康复需求的医学不稳定患者的专科超急性住院康复服务的成本效益:一项前瞻性队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e012112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012112.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the nurse care assessment for in-hospital spinal cord injury rehabilitation.住院脊髓损伤康复护理评估的发展
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2025 Mar 28;11(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41394-025-00702-4.
2
Rehabilitation outcomes after comprehensive post-acute inpatient rehabilitation following moderate to severe acquired brain injury-study protocol for an overall prognosis study based on routinely collected health data.中度至重度获得性脑损伤后综合急性后期住院康复的康复结局——基于常规收集的健康数据进行总体预后研究的研究方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2025 Jan 7;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00183-3.
3
What criteria for neuropronostication: consciousness or ability? The neuro-intensivist's dilemma.
神经预后判断的标准是什么:意识还是能力?神经重症监护医生的困境。
Crit Care. 2024 Oct 3;28(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05098-5.
4
The new hospital discharge form for inpatient rehabilitation in Italy: a step forward to promote the role of rehabilitation in the healthcare system.意大利新的住院康复出院表单:促进康复在医疗保健系统中发挥作用的一步。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;60(5):737-740. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08628-3. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Unmet rehabilitation needs in the first 6 months post-injury in a trauma centre population with moderate-to-severe traumatic injuries.创伤中心中中重度创伤伤员伤后 6 个月内未满足的康复需求。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 May 27;56:jrm40078. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40078.
6
Rehabilitation complexity scale and reimbursement of in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation.住院肺部康复的康复复杂性量表与费用报销
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):936. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2023.936. eCollection 2023 Jan 17.
7
An machine learning model to predict quality of life subtypes of disabled stroke survivors.一种用于预测残疾脑卒中幸存者生活质量亚型的机器学习模型。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Feb;11(2):404-413. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51960. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
8
Medical Rehabilitation Need, Case Complexity, and Related Issues among Patients in an Acute Stroke Rehabilitation Setting.急性中风康复环境中患者的医疗康复需求、病例复杂性及相关问题
Phys Ther Res. 2022;25(3):93-98. doi: 10.1298/ptr.R0021. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
9
The impact of road safety strategy and policy on admissions to a national rehabilitation hospital; a 5-year retrospective review and reflection on trauma data.道路安全策略和政策对国家康复医院入院人数的影响:对创伤数据的 5 年回顾性审查和反思。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09177-1.
10
Prediction of emergence from prolonged disorders of consciousness from measures within the UK rehabilitation outcomes collaborative database: a multicentre analysis using machine learning.从英国康复结果协作数据库中的措施预测长时间意识障碍的恢复:使用机器学习的多中心分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Sep;45(18):2906-2914. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2114017. Epub 2022 Aug 27.