Khoshbin E, Prayaga S, Kinsella J, Sutherland F W H
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital and Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 24;1(2):e000266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000266. Print 2011.
Background Mini-sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement aims to reduce operative trauma hastening recovery and improving the cosmetic outcome of cardiac surgery. The short-term clinical benefits from the mini-sternotomy are presumed to arise because the incision is less extensive and the lower half of the chest cage remains intact. The basic conduct of virtually all other aspects of the aortic valve replacement procedure remains the same. Therefore, similar long-term outcomes are to be expected. Objectives To conduct a meta-analysis of the only available randomised controlled trials (RCT) in the published English literature. Data sources Electronic search for relevant publications in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were performed. Four studies met the criteria. Study eligibility criteria RCT comparing minimally invasive (inverted C or L (J)-shaped) hemi-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for adults undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement using standard cardiopulmonary bypass technique. Methods Outcome measures were the length of positive pressure ventilation, blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. Results The length of ICU stay was significantly shorter by 0.57 days in favour of the mini-sternotomy group (CI -0.95 to -0.2; p=0.003). There was no advantage in terms of duration of ventilation (CI -3.48 to 0.36; p=0.11). However, there was some evidence to suggest a reduction in blood loss and the length of stay in hospital in the mini-sternotomy group. This did not prove to be statistically significant (154.17 ml reduction (CI -324.51 to 16.17; p=0.08) and 2.03 days less (CI -4.12 to 0.05; p=0.06), respectively). Limitations This study includes a relatively small number of subjects (n=220) and outcome variables. The risk of bias was not assessed during this meta-analysis. Conclusion Mini-sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement significantly reduces the length of stay in the cardiac ICU. Other short-term benefits may include a reduction in blood loss or the length of hospital stay.
背景 用于单纯主动脉瓣置换的微创胸骨切开术旨在减少手术创伤,加速康复并改善心脏手术的美容效果。微创胸骨切开术的短期临床益处被认为是由于切口范围较小且胸廓下半部保持完整。主动脉瓣置换手术几乎所有其他方面的基本操作保持不变。因此,预期会有相似的长期结果。目的 对已发表的英文文献中仅有的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。数据来源 在MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库中进行相关出版物的电子检索。四项研究符合标准。研究入选标准 采用标准体外循环技术,对接受单纯主动脉瓣置换的成人进行微创(倒C形或L(J)形)半胸骨切开术与传统胸骨切开术的随机对照试验。方法 观察指标为正压通气时间、失血量、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和住院时间。结果 微创胸骨切开术组的ICU住院时间显著缩短0.57天(可信区间为-0.95至-0.2;p = 0.003)。在通气时间方面没有优势(可信区间为-3.48至0.36;p = 0.11)。然而,有一些证据表明微创胸骨切开术组的失血量和住院时间有所减少。但这在统计学上并不显著(分别减少154.17毫升(可信区间为-324.51至16.17;p = 0.08)和2.03天(可信区间为-4.12至0.05;p = 0.06))。局限性 本研究纳入的受试者数量(n = 220)和观察变量相对较少。在本次荟萃分析中未评估偏倚风险。结论 用于单纯主动脉瓣置换的微创胸骨切开术显著缩短了心脏ICU的住院时间。其他短期益处可能包括失血量减少或住院时间缩短。