• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响失语症患者健康相关生活质量的重要因素有哪些?一项系统评价。

What are the important factors in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Language, City University London, London, UK.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1 Suppl):S86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.028. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.028
PMID:22119074
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors associated with or predictive of poor health-related quality of life (HRQL) in people with aphasia poststroke. Better understanding of these factors can allow better targeting of rehabilitation programs.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases, covering medical (eg, Medline, Excerpta Medica Database, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Ovid, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database) and social sciences (eg, PsycINFO) were searched and key experts were approached.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies including specific information on the HRQL of people with aphasia poststroke using validated HRQL measures or established ways of analyzing qualitative data were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies against the eligibility criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

This was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Quantitative studies were assessed for quality with Counsell and Dennis' critical appraisal tool for systematic review of prognostic models in acute stroke; qualitative studies with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool for qualitative research.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fourteen research reports met the eligibility criteria. Because of their high heterogeneity, the data synthesis was narrative. The evidence is not strong enough to determine the main predictors of HRQL in people with aphasia. Still, emotional distress/depression, severity of aphasia and communication disability, other medical problems, activity limitations, and aspects of social network and support were important factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Emotional distress, aphasia severity, communication and activity limitations, other medical problems, and social factors affect HRQL. Stroke HRQL studies need to include people with aphasia and report separately on them, in order to determine the main predictors of their HRQL and to identify what interventions can best address them.

摘要

目的

确定与脑卒中后失语症患者健康相关生活质量(HRQL)较差相关或可预测的因素。更好地了解这些因素可以使康复计划的目标更加明确。

资料来源

电子数据库,涵盖医学(例如,Medline、Excerpta Medica Database、Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Ovid、Allied and Complementary Medicine Database)和社会科学(例如,PsycINFO),并联系了关键专家。

研究选择

包括使用经过验证的 HRQL 测量或既定方法分析定性数据的脑卒中后失语症患者 HRQL 特定信息的研究被纳入。两位审查员独立筛选符合入选标准的研究。

资料提取

这是由两位审查员独立进行的。如有分歧,则通过协商解决。对定量研究采用 Counsell 和 Dennis 的急性脑卒中预后模型系统评价的批判性评价工具进行质量评估;对定性研究采用批判性评估技能计划工具进行定性研究。

资料综合

符合入选标准的研究报告有 14 篇。由于其高度异质性,数据综合是叙述性的。证据还不够有力,无法确定影响失语症患者 HRQL 的主要预测因素。然而,情绪困扰/抑郁、失语症严重程度和沟通障碍、其他医疗问题、活动受限以及社会网络和支持的某些方面是重要因素。

结论

情绪困扰、失语症严重程度、沟通和活动受限、其他医疗问题以及社会因素会影响 HRQL。脑卒中 HRQL 研究需要纳入失语症患者,并单独报告他们,以便确定影响他们 HRQL 的主要预测因素,并确定哪些干预措施最能解决这些问题。

相似文献

1
What are the important factors in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systematic review.影响失语症患者健康相关生活质量的重要因素有哪些?一项系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1 Suppl):S86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.028. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Aerobic exercise training for adults with fibromyalgia.针对纤维肌痛成人患者的有氧运动训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 21;6(6):CD012700. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012700.
8
Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.青少年重复意外怀孕干预消除计划(INTERUPT):干预效果与成本效益的系统评价,以及实施因素和用户参与的定性与实在论综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(16):1-214. doi: 10.3310/hta20160.
9
A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia.一项关于预防和治疗中风后失语症患者抑郁症的康复干预措施的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(16):1870-1892. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1315181. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Music interventions for acquired brain injury.后天性脑损伤的音乐干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 20;1(1):CD006787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006787.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review and thematic analysis on coping strategies used by people with aphasia.一项关于失语症患者应对策略的范围综述和主题分析。
Aphasiology. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2025.2501628.
2
Stroke-associated dysarthria.中风相关性构音障碍
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1629640. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1629640. eCollection 2025.
3
Post stroke depression: pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms of natural product-based interventions.中风后抑郁症:基于天然产物干预的发病机制及分子机制
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 19;16:1595160. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1595160. eCollection 2025.
4
The Benefits of Conversation Group Treatment for Individuals With Chronic Aphasia: Updated Evidence From a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial on Measures of Language and Communication.对话小组治疗对慢性失语症患者的益处:一项关于语言和沟通测量的多中心随机对照试验的最新证据
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 May 6;34(3):1203-1218. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00279. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
5
Comparing factors influencing wellbeing in young adults with aphasia and young adults with developmental language disorder.比较影响失语症青年成人和发育性语言障碍青年成人幸福感的因素。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):e70020. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70020.
6
Main Concepts for Three Different Discourse Tasks in a Large Non-Clinical Sample.来自大量非临床样本的三种不同话语任务的主要概念。
Aphasiology. 2016;30(1):45-73. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1057891. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
7
Need for Human Interaction and Acknowledging Communication-An Interview Study With Patients With Aphasia Following Stroke.对人际互动和认可交流的需求——一项针对中风后失语症患者的访谈研究
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jun;81(6):3129-3140. doi: 10.1111/jan.16512. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
8
AI-assisted assessment and treatment of aphasia: a review.人工智能辅助的失语症评估与治疗:综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1401240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401240. eCollection 2024.
9
A Rose by Any Other Name: Mapping Taxonomic and Thematic Naming Errors Poststroke.换个玫瑰名:中风后分类和主题命名错误的映射。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;36(10):2251-2267. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02236.
10
'A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want': A Mixed-Methods Approach to Explore and Benchmark Clinically Meaningful Changes in Aphasia Recovery.“有意义的差异,但不是我想要的最终差异”:一种混合方法,旨在探索和基准化失语症康复中的临床有意义的变化。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14169. doi: 10.1111/hex.14169.