• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业康复样本中爱德华个人偏好量表的因素结构

Factor structure of the Edwards personal preference schedule in a vocational rehabilitation sample.

作者信息

Cooper D

机构信息

North Bay Psychiatric Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1990 Jul;46(4):421-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199007)46:4<421::aid-jclp2270460408>3.0.co;2-i.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199007)46:4<421::aid-jclp2270460408>3.0.co;2-i
PMID:2212044
Abstract

The 15 scales of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule were factor analyzed for 450 male and 89 female vocational rehabilitation clients in order to compare results by gender as well as combining them to compare with the college norming data in the EPPS manual. Correlations and factors were similar in many ways when the combined sample and norm samples were compared, but larger and consistent differences between the study scores suggest that separate norms are justified and that norm tables need to be revised.

摘要

对爱德华个人偏好量表的15个分量表,针对450名男性和89名女性职业康复服务对象进行了因素分析,目的是按性别比较结果,并将二者合并后与该量表手册中的大学常模数据进行比较。将合并样本与常模样本进行比较时,相关性和因素在很多方面相似,但研究分数之间更大且一致的差异表明,单独的常模是合理的,常模表需要修订。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the Edwards personal preference schedule in a vocational rehabilitation sample.职业康复样本中爱德华个人偏好量表的因素结构
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Jul;46(4):421-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199007)46:4<421::aid-jclp2270460408>3.0.co;2-i.
2
Use of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule with alcoholics in a vocational rehabilitation program.在职业康复项目中对酗酒者使用爱德华兹个人偏好量表。
J Psychol. 1968 Mar;68(2):287-9. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1968.10543435.
3
Assessing gender-related differences in achievement orientation using two different achievement scales.使用两种不同的成就量表评估成就取向方面与性别相关的差异。
J Pers Assess. 1989 Summer;53(2):229-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5302_2.
4
Medical students' Edwards Personal Preference Schedule norms.
Psychol Rep. 1988 Oct;63(2):465-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.465.
5
Self-other orientations and the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.自我与他人取向及爱德华个人偏好量表
J Pers Assess. 1975 Jun;39(3):293-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3903_11.
6
[Diagnostics of work motivation (DIAMO): optimization and construct validity].[工作动机诊断(DIAMO):优化与结构效度]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2009 Jan;59(1):21-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-986296. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
7
Manifest needs of prospective counselors: a comparative study.准咨询师的明显需求:一项比较研究。
J Psychol. 1991 Jan;125(1):101-8. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1991.10543275.
8
[Motivation for psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic treatment of vocational stresses -- development and validation of a questionnaire].[职业压力的心身-心理治疗动机——一份问卷的编制与验证]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Feb;44(1):14-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-834599.
9
Factor analysis of the WAIS-R and Verbal Memory and Visual Memory Indices of the Wechsler Memory Scale--Revised, for a vocational rehabilitation sample.
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Jun;76(3 Pt 1):907-11. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.3.907.
10
The factor structure of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire and participants of vocational rehabilitation.明尼苏达满意度问卷的因素结构与职业康复参与者
Psychol Rep. 2000 Aug;87(1):34-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.1.34.