Alzheimer Disease Research Unit, CIEN Foundation, Carlos III Institute of Health, Alzheimer Center Reina Sofia Foundation, Madrid, Spain.
Fam Pract. 2012 Aug;29(4):401-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr114. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
To study the yield of three instruments for detection of patients with cognitive impairment in primary care. To investigate whether combining tests is better for detecting impairment than applying them separately.
Seven primary care physicians (PCP) systematically recruited individuals aged over 49 years with a complaint or suspicion of cognitive impairment. The tests administered were the Mini-Mental State Test (MMS), the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) and the Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). We calculated sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) and applied logistic regression analysis to determine the yield of the tests in combination. The gold standard was the clinical judgement of a neurologist based on a comprehensive assessment, which included a formal neuropsychological workup.
Of the 160 study patients, 90 (56%) had cognitive impairment (15 of these had dementia). The MMS had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 70% in screening for cognitive impairment, with an AUC of 0.82. Incorporation of the IQCODE increased the AUC to 0.86 (P = 0.01). As for dementia, the FAQ reached a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 82%, with an AUC of 0.91. Incorporation of the MMS increased the AUC to 0.95 (P = 0.03).
Cognitive impairment is probably underdiagnosed in primary care. The combination of the FAQ and the MMS had excellent performance for dementia detection; however, no satisfactory instrument or instrument combination could be found for cognitive impairment.
研究三种用于检测初级保健中认知障碍患者的工具的检出率。探讨联合测试是否比单独应用更好地检测障碍。
7 名初级保健医生(PCP)系统地招募了年龄在 49 岁以上、有认知障碍主诉或疑似症状的患者。所使用的测试是简易精神状态检查(MMS)、老年认知障碍知情者问卷(IQCODE)和 Pfeffer 功能活动问卷(FAQ)。我们计算了灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC),并应用逻辑回归分析来确定测试联合应用的检出率。金标准是神经病学家根据全面评估的临床判断,其中包括正式的神经心理测试。
在 160 名研究患者中,90 名(56%)有认知障碍(其中 15 名患有痴呆)。MMS 筛查认知障碍的灵敏度为 77%,特异性为 70%,AUC 为 0.82。纳入 IQCODE 后,AUC 增加至 0.86(P = 0.01)。对于痴呆,FAQ 的灵敏度为 87%,特异性为 82%,AUC 为 0.91。纳入 MMS 后,AUC 增加至 0.95(P = 0.03)。
认知障碍在初级保健中可能被低估。FAQ 和 MMS 的联合应用对痴呆检测具有出色的性能;然而,对于认知障碍,没有找到令人满意的单一工具或工具组合。