Araujo Júnior Edward, Martinez Luis Henrique, Simioni Christiane, Martins Wellington P, Nardozza Luciano M, Moron Antonio F
Department of Obstetrics, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Sep;25(9):1818-21. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.644364. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
To assess the fetal lumbosacral spine by three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography using volume contrast imaging (VCI) omni view method and compare reproducibility and agreement between three different measurement techniques: standard mouse, high definition mouse and pen-tablet.
A comparative and prospective study with 40 pregnant women between 20 and 34 + 6 weeks was realized. 3D volume datasets of the fetal spine were acquired using a convex transabdominal transducer. Starting scan plane was the coronal section of fetal lumbosacral spine by VCI-C function. Omni view manual trace was selected and a parallel plane of fetal spine was drawn including interest region. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for reproducibility analysis. The relative difference between three used techniques was compared by chi-square test and Fischer test.
Pen-tablet showed better reliability (ICC=0.987). In the relative proportion of differences, this was significantly higher for the pen-tablet (82.14%; p<0.01). In paired comparison, the relative difference was significantly greater for the pen-tablet (p<0.01).
The pen-tablet showed to be the most reproductive and concordant method in the measurement of body vertebral area of fetal lumbosacral spine by 3D ultrasonography using the VCI.
采用容积对比成像(VCI)全视角方法通过三维(3D)超声评估胎儿腰骶椎,并比较三种不同测量技术(标准鼠标、高清鼠标和数位板)之间的可重复性和一致性。
对40例孕周在20至34 + 6周之间的孕妇进行了一项对比性前瞻性研究。使用凸阵经腹探头获取胎儿脊柱的3D容积数据集。起始扫描平面为通过VCI-C功能获得的胎儿腰骶椎冠状切面。选择全视角手动追踪,绘制包含感兴趣区域的胎儿脊柱平行平面。组内相关系数(ICC)用于可重复性分析。采用卡方检验和费舍尔检验比较三种所用技术之间的相对差异。
数位板显示出更好的可靠性(ICC = 0.987)。在差异的相对比例方面,数位板的比例显著更高(82.14%;p < 0.01)。在配对比较中,数位板的相对差异显著更大(p < 0.01)。
在使用VCI的3D超声测量胎儿腰骶椎椎体面积时,数位板是最具重复性和一致性的方法。