University of Kansas.
J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):835-62. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000365. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
The effect of neighborhood density on optional infinitives was evaluated for typically developing (TD) children and children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Forty children, twenty in each group, completed two production tasks that assessed third person singular production. Half of the sentences in each task presented a dense verb, and half presented a sparse verb. Children's third person singular accuracy was compared across dense and sparse verbs. Results showed that the TD group was significantly less likely to use optional infinitives with dense, rather than sparse verbs. In contrast, the distribution of optional infinitives for the SLI group was independent of verb neighborhood density. Follow-up analyses showed that the lack of neighborhood density effect for the SLI group could not be attributed to heterogeneous neighborhood density effects or floor effects. Results were interpreted within the Optional Infinitive/Extended Optional Infinitive accounts for typical language development and SLI for English-speaking children.
本研究旨在评估社区密度对典型发展儿童(TD)和特定语言障碍儿童(SLI)的不定词选择的影响。四十名儿童,每组二十名,完成了两项评估第三人称单数的产生任务。每个任务的一半句子呈现出密集动词,另一半呈现出稀疏动词。比较了儿童在密集动词和稀疏动词上的第三人称单数准确性。结果表明,TD 组使用密集动词的不定词选择明显少于稀疏动词。相比之下,SLI 组的不定词选择分布与动词社区密度无关。后续分析表明,SLI 组缺乏社区密度效应不能归因于异质社区密度效应或地板效应。研究结果在典型语言发展的不定词/扩展不定词和 SLI 对英语儿童的解释框架内进行了阐释。