Suppr超能文献

一份简短的报告:词级音系和词汇特征相互作用,影响音位意识。

A short report: Word-level phonological and lexical characteristics interact to influence phoneme awareness.

机构信息

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;43(4):346-56. doi: 10.1177/0022219410369083. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

Abstract

In this study, we examined the influence of word-level phonological and lexical characteristics on early phoneme awareness. Typically developing children, ages 61 to 78 months, completed a phoneme-based, odd-one-out task that included consonant-vowel-consonant word sets (e.g., "chair-chain-ship") that varied orthogonally by a phonological characteristic, sound contrast similarity (similar vs. dissimilar), and a lexical characteristic, neighborhood density (dense vs. sparse). In a subsample of the participants-those with the highest vocabularies-results were in line with a predicted interactive effect of phonological and lexical characteristics on phoneme awareness performance: word sets contrasting similar sounds were less likely to yield correct responses in words from sparse neighborhoods than words from dense neighborhoods. Word sets contrasting dissimilar sounds were most likely to yield correct responses regardless of the words' neighborhood density. Based on these findings, theories of early phoneme awareness should consider both word-level and child-level influences on performance. Attention to these influences is predicted to result in more sensitive and specific measures of reading risk.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们考察了词级音位和词汇特征对早期音位意识的影响。61 至 78 个月大的正常发育儿童完成了一项基于音位的、与众不同的任务,其中包括辅音-元音-辅音的单词集(例如“chair-chain-ship”),这些单词集在音位特征、音位对比相似性(相似与不相似)和词汇特征、邻接密度(密集与稀疏)上是正交变化的。在参与者的一个子样本中——那些词汇量最高的参与者——结果与音位和词汇特征对音位意识表现的预测交互效应一致:在稀疏邻域的单词中,与相似声音形成对比的单词集比在密集邻域的单词中更不可能产生正确的反应。与不相似声音形成对比的单词集最有可能产生正确的反应,而与单词的邻接密度无关。基于这些发现,早期音位意识的理论应该考虑到词级和儿童级对表现的影响。关注这些影响有望导致更敏感和具体的阅读风险衡量标准。

相似文献

1
A short report: Word-level phonological and lexical characteristics interact to influence phoneme awareness.
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;43(4):346-56. doi: 10.1177/0022219410369083. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
2
Phonological and lexical influences on phonological awareness in children with specific language impairment and dyslexia.
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 4;5:838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00838. eCollection 2014.
3
The influence of neighborhood density and word frequency on phoneme awareness in 2nd and 4th grades.
J Commun Disord. 2011 Jan-Feb;44(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
4
Lexical restructuring in the absence of literacy.
Cognition. 2007 Nov;105(2):334-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.002.
5
A descriptive study examining phonological awareness and literacy development in children with Down syndrome.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2014;66(1-2):48-57. doi: 10.1159/000364864. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
6
Quality of phonological representations, verbal learning, and phoneme awareness in dyslexic and normal readers.
Scand J Psychol. 2005 Aug;46(4):375-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00468.x.
9
Speech sound characteristics of early words: influence of phonological factors across vocabulary development.
J Child Lang. 2018 May;45(3):673-702. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000484. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
10
Developmental surface dyslexias.
Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1146-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
2
The Relation Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Phonological Awareness in Children With Cochlear Implants.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2386-2402. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00259. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Neighborhood Density and Syntactic Class Effects on Spoken Word Recognition: Specific Language Impairment and Typical Development.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 May 17;61(5):1226-1237. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0099.
4
Longitudinal development of speech motor control: Motor and linguistic factors.
J Mot Learn Dev. 2015 Jun;3(1):53-68. doi: 10.1123/jmld.2014-0054.
5
Phonological and lexical influences on phonological awareness in children with specific language impairment and dyslexia.
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 4;5:838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00838. eCollection 2014.
6
Grammatical treatment and specific language impairment: neighbourhood density & third person singular -s.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Sep;27(9):661-80. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.789928. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
7
The interface between neighborhood density and optional infinitives: normal development and Specific Language Impairment.
J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):835-62. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000365. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

2
The Lexicon and Phonology: Interactions in Language Acquisition.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2002 Jan 1;33(1):24-37. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2002/003).
3
Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty.
Ann Dyslexia. 1984 Jan;34(1):117-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02663616.
5
Phonemic awareness of coda consonants and sonority in bilingual children.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2001;15(1-2):35-9. doi: 10.3109/02699200109167627.
7
The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: implications for the assessment of phonological awareness.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2005 Oct;36(4):285-93. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2005/029).
8
A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):481-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195594.
9
The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Oct;47(5):1048-58. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/078).
10
Cost-effective prediction of reading difficulties.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Aug;47(4):751-65. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/057).

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验