Mainela-Arnold Elina, Evans Julia L, Coady Jeffry A
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Pennsylvania State University, 401K Ford Building, University Park, PA 16802-3100, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr;51(2):381-93. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/028).
This study investigated lexical representations of children with specific language impairment (SLI) and typically developing, chronological age-matched (CA) peers on a frequency-manipulated gating task. The study tested the hypothesis that children with SLI have holistic phonological representations of words, that is, that children with SLI would exhibit smaller effects of neighborhood density on gating durations than CA peers and that children with SLI would be as efficient as CA peers in accessing high-frequency words but that they would differ from their age-matched peers in accessing low-frequency words.
Thirty-two children (ages 8;5-12;3 [years;months]) participated: 16 children with SLI and 16 typically developing peers matched on age and nonverbal IQ. Children's word guesses after different gating durations were investigated.
Contrary to predictions, no group differences in effects of distributional regularity were found: Children in both groups required equally longer acoustic chunks to access words that were low in frequency and came from dense neighborhoods. However, children with SLI appeared to vacillate between multiple word candidates at significantly later gates when compared with children in the CA group.
Children with SLI did not exhibit evidence for phonologically holistic lexical representations. Instead, they appeared more vulnerable to competing words.
本研究通过一项频率操控的选通任务,调查了特定语言障碍(SLI)儿童与发育正常、年龄匹配(CA)的同龄人在词汇表征方面的情况。该研究检验了以下假设:患有SLI的儿童具有单词的整体语音表征,即患有SLI的儿童在选通持续时间上受邻域密度的影响比CA组同龄人小,并且患有SLI的儿童在获取高频单词时与CA组同龄人一样高效,但在获取低频单词时与年龄匹配的同龄人存在差异。
32名儿童(年龄8岁5个月至12岁3个月)参与了研究:16名患有SLI的儿童和16名发育正常、年龄和非语言智商匹配的同龄人。研究调查了不同选通持续时间后儿童的单词猜测情况。
与预测相反,未发现两组在分布规律效应上存在差异:两组儿童都需要同样更长的语音片段来获取低频且来自密集邻域的单词。然而,与CA组儿童相比,患有SLI的儿童在明显更晚的选通阶段似乎在多个单词候选之间摇摆不定。
患有SLI的儿童没有表现出语音整体词汇表征的证据。相反,他们似乎更容易受到竞争单词的影响。