The Department of Pharmacy, Chonbuk National University Hospital, and The Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, South Korea.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;31(7):1663-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1490-9. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
The bacteriological efficacy response (improved, arbekacin vs. vancomycin; 71.2% vs. 79.5%) and clinical efficacy response (improved, arbekacin vs. vancomycin; 65.3% vs. 76.1%) were not statistically different between the two groups. The complication rate was significantly higher in the vancomycin group (32.9%) compared to the arbekacin group (15.1%) (p=0.019). Arbekacin was not inferior to vancomycin, and it could be a good alternative drug for vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treatment.
两组间的细菌学疗效反应(改善,阿贝卡星 vs. 万古霉素;71.2% vs. 79.5%)和临床疗效反应(改善,阿贝卡星 vs. 万古霉素;65.3% vs. 76.1%)无统计学差异。万古霉素组的并发症发生率(32.9%)明显高于阿贝卡星组(15.1%)(p=0.019)。阿贝卡星并不逊于万古霉素,对于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的治疗,它可能是万古霉素的一种替代药物。