Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Dec;45(6):1036-43. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011000600005.
To estimate the prevalence of cesarean sections in a birth center of a hospital and identify factors associated.
Cross-sectional study including medical records of 2,441 births assisted in a birth center in the city of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil, between March and April 2005. The dependent variable (type of delivery) included vaginal delivery and cesarean section. The independent variables were grouped into four categories: demographic characteristics; current and past obstetric history; intrapartum care; and perinatal outcomes. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated to assess the association between type of delivery and maternal and newborn variables.
Of all deliveries, 14.9% were cesarean sections. Cesarean section in the current pregnancy was associated with past cesarean sections (PR = 3.19, 95%CI: 2.64,3.84); gestational age > 40 weeks (PR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.09;1.61); cervical dilation of up to 4 cm on admission (PR = 3.22, 95%CI: 2.31;4.50); and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (PR = 2.5, 95%CI: 2.05;3.06). Regarding newborn characteristics cesarean section was associated with birth weight >4 kg (PR = 1.86, 95%CI: 1.29;2.66). Among women with history of past cesarean sections, having had also a prior vaginal delivery was a protective factor for cesarean section in the current pregnancy (PR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30;0.71). Factors related to fetal conditions including fetal stress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, breech presentation and macrosomia accounted for 47.8% (175) while those related to the mechanism of birth including arrest disorders, functional dystocia and malposition accounted for 31,3% (115) of all indications for a cesarian section [corrected].
Prevalence of c-section was consistent with World Health Organization recommendations. Increased risk of c-section was associated with prior history of c-sections, cervical dilation of at least 4 cm upon admission, gestational age > 40 weeks, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and birthweight > 4 kg.
评估一家医院分娩中心行剖宫产术的流行率,并确定相关因素。
本研究为横断性研究,纳入了 2005 年 3 月至 4 月间在巴西东南部城市圣保罗一家分娩中心分娩的 2441 例产妇的病历资料。因变量(分娩方式)包括阴道分娩和剖宫产。自变量分为四类:人口统计学特征;当前和既往产科史;产时护理;以及围产儿结局。为评估分娩方式与产妇和新生儿变量之间的关系,我们使用了比值比和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。
所有分娩中,剖宫产率为 14.9%。本次妊娠行剖宫产与既往剖宫产史(PR = 3.19,95%CI:2.64,3.84)、胎龄>40 周(PR = 1.32,95%CI:1.09;1.61)、入院时宫颈扩张至 4cm 以内(PR = 3.22,95%CI:2.31;4.50)和羊水粪染(PR = 2.5,95%CI:2.05;3.06)相关。对于新生儿特征,剖宫产与出生体重>4kg(PR = 1.86,95%CI:1.29;2.66)相关。既往有剖宫产史的产妇中,既往行阴道分娩是本次妊娠行剖宫产的保护因素(PR = 0.46,95%CI:0.30;0.71)。与胎儿状况相关的因素包括胎儿窘迫、羊水粪染、臀位和巨大儿,占所有剖宫产指征的 47.8%(175),而与分娩机制相关的因素包括产程停滞、功能失调性分娩和胎位不正,占 31.3%(115)[已更正]。
剖宫产率与世界卫生组织的建议一致。剖宫产风险增加与既往剖宫产史、入院时宫颈至少扩张 4cm、胎龄>40 周、羊水粪染和出生体重>4kg 相关。