Hoxha Ilir, Lama Arber, Bunjaku Genta, Grezda Krenare, Agahi Riaz, Beqiri Petrit, Goodman David C
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Kolegji Heimerer, 10000, Prishtina, Kosovo.
Res Health Serv Reg. 2022 Jun 22;1(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s43999-022-00002-6.
Unnecessary caesarean births may be affected by physician factors, such as preferences, incentives and convenience. Delivery during office hours can be a valuable proxy for measuring such effects.
To determine the effect of office hours on the decision for caesarean delivery by assessing the odds of caesarean during office hours compared to out-of-office hours.
We searched CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from the beginning of records through August 2021.
Search results were screened by three researchers. First, we selected studies that reported odds ratios of caesareans, or data allowing their calculation, for office and out-of-office hours. We extracted data on the study population, study design, data sources, setting, type of caesarean section, statistical analysis, and outcome measures. For groups reporting the same outcome, we performed a standard inverse-variance random-effects meta-analysis, which enabled us to calculate the overall odds ratios for each group. For groups reporting varying outcomes, we performed descriptive analysis.
Meta-analysis of weekday vs weekend for any caesarean section showed higher odds of caesarean during weekdays in adjusted analysis 1.40 (95%CI 1.13, 1.72 from 1,952,691 births). A similar effect was observed in the weekday vs Sunday comparison (1.39, 95%CI 1.10, 1.75, 150,932 births). A lower effect was observed for emergency CS, with a slight increase in adjusted analysis (1.06, 95%CI 0.90, 1.26, 2,622,772 births) and a slightly higher increase in unadjusted analysis (1.15, 95%CI 1.03, 1.29, 12,591,485 births). Similar trends were observed in subgroup analyses and descriptive synthesis of studies examining other office hours outcomes.
Delivery during office hours is associated with higher odds for overall caesarean sections and little to no effect for emergency caesarean. Non-clinical factors associated with office hours may influence the decision to deliver by caesarean section. Further detailed investigation of the "office hours effect" in delivery care is necessary and could lead to improvements in care systems.
The authors received no direct funding for this study.
不必要的剖宫产可能受到医生因素的影响,如偏好、激励措施和便利性。在办公时间分娩可作为衡量此类影响的一个有价值的指标。
通过评估办公时间与非办公时间剖宫产的几率,确定办公时间对剖宫产决策的影响。
我们检索了CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.gov、考克兰图书馆、PubMed、Scopus和科学网,检索时间从各数据库记录起始至2021年8月。
由三名研究人员筛选检索结果。首先,我们选择报告了办公时间和非办公时间剖宫产比值比或可用于计算比值比的数据的研究。我们提取了关于研究人群、研究设计、数据来源、环境、剖宫产类型、统计分析和结局指标的数据。对于报告相同结局的组,我们进行了标准的逆方差随机效应荟萃分析,这使我们能够计算每组的总体比值比。对于报告不同结局的组,我们进行了描述性分析。
对任何剖宫产的工作日与周末进行的荟萃分析显示,在调整分析中,工作日剖宫产的几率更高,为1.40(95%CI 1.13,1.72;1,952,691例分娩)。在工作日与周日的比较中也观察到类似效果(1.39,95%CI 1.10,1.75;150,932例分娩)。急诊剖宫产的影响较低,调整分析中有轻微增加(1.06,95%CI 0.90,1.26;2,622,772例分娩),未调整分析中的增加略高(1.15,95%CI 1.03,1.29;12,591,485例分娩)。在亚组分析以及对研究其他办公时间结局的描述性综合分析中也观察到类似趋势。
办公时间分娩与总体剖宫产几率较高相关,而对急诊剖宫产几乎没有影响。与办公时间相关的非临床因素可能会影响剖宫产的分娩决策。有必要对分娩护理中的“办公时间效应”进行进一步详细调查,这可能会改善护理系统。
作者未获得本研究的直接资金。