Diehl Joshua John, Paul Rhea
Department of Psychology, 118A Haggar Hall, University of Notre Dame, IN, USA, 46556.
Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012 Jan;6(1):123-134. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.03.012.
In research, it has been difficult to characterize the prosodic production differences that have been observed clinically in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Moreover, the nature of these differences has been particularly hard to identify. This study examined one possible contributor to these perceived differences: motor planning. We examined the ability of children and adolescents with ASD to imitate prosodic patterns in comparison to a group with learning disabilities (LD) and a typically-developing (TD) comparison group. Overall, we found that both the ASD and LD groups were significantly worse at perceiving and imitating prosodic patterns than the TD comparison group. Similar to previous studies using non-imitative speech, participants with ASD showed a significantly longer duration of utterances than the two comparison groups when attempting to imitate an intonation pattern. The implications of differences in duration of utterances are discussed. This study also highlights the importance of using clinical comparison groups in studies of language performance in individuals with ASD.
在研究中,一直难以描述在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)临床中观察到的韵律产生差异。此外,这些差异的本质尤其难以确定。本研究考察了这些明显差异的一个可能成因:运动规划。我们将患有ASD的儿童和青少年与学习障碍(LD)组以及典型发育(TD)对照组进行比较,考察他们模仿韵律模式的能力。总体而言,我们发现ASD组和LD组在感知和模仿韵律模式方面明显比TD对照组差。与之前使用非模仿性言语的研究相似,患有ASD的参与者在尝试模仿语调模式时,其话语时长明显长于两个对照组。文中讨论了话语时长差异的影响。本研究还强调了在ASD个体语言表现研究中使用临床对照组的重要性。